Kathayee v. Subramanian
Case brief
What is this about?
The Madras High Court allowed a Civil Revision Petition under Article 227, directing the Subordinate Judge, Pattukottai, to dispose of an interlocutory application in a partition suit within three months to expedite justice.
What did the court decide?
Direction to the learned Subordinate Judge, Pattukottai, to dispose of I.A.No.475 of 2016 in O.S.No.58 of 2015 within three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.
What the court decided
1
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED : 16.03.2018
CORAM :
THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE J.NISHA BANU
C.R.P.(PD)(MD)No.572 of 2018
Kathayee ... Petitioner / Petitioner / Defendant
vs.
Subramanian ... Respondent / Respondent / Plaintiff
PRAYER: Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, to direct the learned Subordinate Judge, Pattukottai, to expedite and dispose of I.A.No.475 of 2016 in O.S.No.58 of 2015 on the file of the Sub Court, Pattukottai, within a stipulated time limit.
For Petitioner : Mr.M.P.Senthil
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether to direct the Subordinate Judge to dispose of an interlocutory application in a partition suit within a stipulated time limit.
Whether the Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 warrants direction for early disposal due to mechanical adjournments.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Kathayee
- respondent
Subramanian
Coram
J. Nisha Banu
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court