The High Court of Madras dismissed two revision petitions under Section 115 CPC for non-prosecution. No counsel appeared for the petitioner or respondent.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED 21.06.2018
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MS.JUSTICE P.T.ASHA
C.R.P. (NPD) Nos.3175 and 3179 of 2010
M.Sharadha Bai ... Petitioner in both cases versus Uthamchand ... Respondent in both cases
Prayer in both cases: Petitions filed under Section 115 of the Civil Procedure Code to set aside the order made in I.A. No.184 of 2009 in O.S. No.2090 of 2008 by the VII Additional Judge, City Civil Court, Chennai dated 20.07.2010.
For petitioner in both cases : No appearance For respondent in both cases : No appearance
COMMON ORDER
When the matters were called on 11.04.2018 and 07.06.2018 at 11.30 a.m. and 12.30 p.m., there was no representation on either side and therefore the same were directed to be listed under the caption 'for dismissal' on the next single sitting. Today, when the matters are called at 11.00 a.m. and once again at 12.10 p.m., there is no representation on either side.
2
P.T.ASHA,J.
vga
not choose to prosecute the proceedings, the revision petitions are dismissed for non prosecution. No costs.
21.06.2018
Index: Yes/No
vga
To
The VII Additional Judge,
City Civil Court, Chennai.
C.R.P. (NPD) Nos.3175 and 3179 of 2010
M.Sharadha Bai
Uthamchand
P.T. ASHA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
