P.a.Sedhurathinam v. Ravi
Case brief
What is this about?
This is a one-line order where the High Court of Judicature at Madras dismissed a revision petition filed under Section 115 CPC for non-prosecution due to the petitioner's absence and failure to appear.
What did the court decide?
Revision petition dismissed for non-prosecution; no costs awarded.
What the court decided
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED 21.06.2018
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MS.JUSTICE P.T.ASHA
C.R.P. (NPD) No.2195 of 2010
P.A.Sedhurathinam ... Petitioner versus Ravi ... Respondent
Prayer: Petition filed under Section 115 of Civil Procedure Code to set aside the judgment and decree made in A.S. No.11 of 2001 dated 08.03.2006 on the file of the Sub Court, Arni, Thiruvannamalai District, confirming the judgment and decree made in O.S. No.391 of 1997 dated 27.07.2000 on the file of the Principal District Munsif, Arni, Thiruvannamalai District.
For petitioner : No appearance
ORDER
When the matter was called at 11.30 a.m. and 12.30 p.m. on 07.06.2018, there was no representation for the petitioner and therefore the same was directed to be listed under the caption 'for dismissal' on the next single sitting. Today, when the matter is called at 11.00 a.m. and once again at 12.10 p.m., there is no representation for the petitioner.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
P.A. Sedhurathinam
- respondent
Ravi
Coram
P.T. Asha
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court