The Madras High Court dismissed a civil revision petition under Section 115 CPC for non-prosecution. The petitioner's counsel, called on the day, reported no instructions from the client regarding the comprehensive partition suit, despite several attempts to obtain them.
The Civil Revision petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 20.06.2018
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MS.JUSTICE P.T. ASHA
CRP.(NPD) No.742 of 2009
M. Soundaravalli ... Petitioner
Vs.
1.E.Nithanantham Naidu
2.A.Ethirajammal
3.Munuswami
4.The Sub Registrar,
Sriperumpudur. . .. Respondents
Prayer: Petition filed under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure
to set aside the order made in I.A.No.2 of 2008 in O.S.No.123 of 2006
on the file ofthe learned Additional District Judge (Fast Track Court
No.1), Poonamallee, dated 13.03.2008.
For Petitioner : Mr.V.S. Sivasundaram For Respondents : No appearance
ORDER
The learned counsel for the petitioner represents that he has http://www.judis.nic.in instructions that the revision petitioner has filed a subsequent
2
P.T. ASHA, J,
mps comprehensive suit for Partition and despite several attempts to get instructions from his client, he has received no instructions and today, when the matter was called, he has reported "no instructions". The Civil Revision petition is therefore dismissed for non prosecution.
20.06.2018 Speaking Order /Non-speaking order Internet : Yes/No Index : Yes /No mps To 1.The Additional District Judge (Fast Track Court No.I), Poonamallee. 2.The Sub Registrar, Sriperumpudur.
CRP.(NPD) No.742 of 2009
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the civil revision petition should be dismissed due to the petitioner's failure to instruct counsel.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
M. Soundaravalli
E.Nithanantham Naidu
A.Ethirajammal
Munuswami
The Sub Registrar, Sriperumpudur
P.T. ASHA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
