Allowed

Periyasamy Alias Cattering v. the Inspector of Police

Madras HC25 Apr 2018CRL OP(MD)/6706/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Madurai Bench of Madras High Court granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner apprehending arrest for offences related to property damage, harassment and public nuisance, subject to filing an undertaking bond and appearing before police for interrogation.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner released on anticipatory bail upon execution of bond for Rs.10,000/- with two sureties and filing of undertaking before the magistrate.

Periyasamy Alias Cattering Vs the Inspector of Police — Anticipatory Bail | Madras HC (2018)

¶1

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction )

¶3

Wednesday, the Twenty Fifth day of April Two Thousand Eighteen

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

The Hon`ble Mr.Justice G.R.SWAMINATHAN

¶6

CRL OP(MD) No.6706 of 2018

¶7

PERIYASAMY ALIAS CATTERING SAMY ... PETITIONER / ACCUSED Rank Not Known

¶8

Vs THE STATE REPRESENTED BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE SIPCOT POLICE STATION, THOOTHUKUDI,THOOTHUKUDI DISTRICT CR NO. 140/2018 ... RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT

¶9

For Petitioner : Mr.A.THIRUVADI KUMAR Advocate

¶10

For Respondent : Mr.A.ROBINSON, Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side)

¶11

For Intervenor : Mr.SATHISH PARASARAN Senior counsel for

¶12

Mr.T.LENIN KUMAR, Advocate in CRL MP(MD)No.3324/18

¶13

PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C.

¶14

ORDER : The Court Made the following order :-

¶15

The petitioner apprehending arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under Sections Sections 147, 148, 341, 294(b), 506(ii) I.P.C, Section 4 of Tamil Nadu Prohibition of Harassment of Women Act and Section 3 of Tamil Nadu Public Property (Prevention of Damage & Loss) Act, 1992, in Crime No.140 of 2018, seeks anticipatory bail.

¶16

2.Mr.Sathish Parasaran, learned Senior Counsel appearing for the intervenor strongly opposed the grant of anticipatory bail in favour of the petitioner. He pointed out that as a result of violation committed in the instant case, young children were grievously injured.

¶17

3.This Court posed a question to the learned counsel for the petitioner as to whether the petitioner after getting anticipatory bail, within a week he will file an affidavit of undertaking before the Jurisdictional Magistrate Court that he would not indulge in any act of violence.

¶18

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 4.This Court makes it clear that the petitioner would be entitled to legally protest. But he can not engage in any violence

¶19

¶20

against the activities of Sterlite Company.

¶21

5.The learned counsel for the petitioner fairly submitted that the petitioner would file an affidavit of undertaking within a week after getting anticipatory bail.

¶22

6.Recording the said undertaking, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner with certain conditions. Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on his appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate No.III, Thoothukudi, and on his executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the petitioner shall appear before the respondent police as and when required for interrogation. The petitioner shall comply with the conditions stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. scrupulously.

¶23

7.The petitioner shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail shall stand dismissed.

sd/-

25/04/2018

/ TRUE COPY /

Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

¶28

¶29

1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO.III THOOTHUKUDI

¶30

2 DO-THROUGH THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, THOOTHUKUDI

¶31

3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE SIPCOT POLICE STATION,

¶32

THOOTHUKUDI, THOOTHUKUDI DISTRICT

¶33

4 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI

¶34

+1. CC to M/S.A.THIRUVADI KUMAR Advocate SR.No.7094 MSA

¶35

JAM/27/04/2018/ PN/VK/ 2P-6C

¶36

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶37

CRL OP(MD) No.6706 of 2018

Periyasamy Alias Cattering v. the Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Periyasamy Alias Cattering v. the Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Manokaran Vs the Sub Inspector of Police

Vigneshkumar Vs the Sub Inspector of Police

Marimuthu Vs the Inspector of Police

Kannan, Vs the Inspector of Police

M.Malathi Vs the Inspector of Police

Kathiravan, Vs the Inspector of Police