Allowed

Kathiravan, v. the Inspector of Police

Madras HC25 Apr 2018CRL OP(MD)/4209/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Madurai Bench of Madras High Court granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner apprehending arrest for IPC offences. The grant was conditional upon an undertaking to pay monthly maintenance starting May 1, 2018, and strict compliance with procedural appearances.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner released on bail with undertaking to pay Rs.10,000 monthly from 01.05.2018 to complainant; execution of bond with two sureties; appearance before police on summons.

Kathiravan, Vs the Inspector of Police — Domestic Violence | Madras HC (2018)

¶1

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction )

¶3

Wednesday, the Twenty Fifth day of April Two Thousand Eighteen

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

The Hon`ble Mr.Justice G.R.SWAMINATHAN

¶6

CRL OP(MD) No.4209 of 2018

¶7

KATHIRAVAN ... PETITIONER/ACCUSED No.1

¶8

Vs STATE REP.BY,

¶9

THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, ALL WOMEN POLICE STATION, SRIVAIKUNDAM, THOOTHUKUDI DISTRICT.

¶10

CRIME NO.1 OF 2018 ... RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT

¶11

For Petitioner : M/S.M.PRABU, Advocate

¶12

For Respondent : M/S.A.ROBINSON, Government Advocate (Crl.Side)

¶13

PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C.

¶14

ORDER : The Court Made the following order :-

¶15

The petitioner apprehending arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offence punishable under Sections 294(b), 498(A) and 506(i) of I.P.C., in Crime No.1 of 2018, on the file of the respondent police, seeks anticipatory bail.

¶16

The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the defacto complainant is the wife of the petitioner and both the children are with the defacto complainant. He further submitted that the petitioner undertakes to pay a sum of Rs.10,000/-(Rupees Ten Thousand Only) every month to the defacto complainant and children and prays for anticipatory bail in favour of the petitioner.

¶17

Heard the learned Government Advocate (Criminal side).

¶18

Considering the undertaking given by the petitioner through his counsel, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner on condition that the liability to pay will arise from 01.05.2018 onwards and if, this undertaking is breached, the order will stand cancelled. It is open to the defacto https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ complainant to accept the said amount without prejudice to her rights and that the petitioner shall deposit the said amount to the

¶19

¶20

credit of Crime No.1 of 2018 on the file of the respondent police before the Jurisdictional Magistrate and it is open to the defacto complainant to withdraw the same and that this arrangement is only for the month of May 2018 and thereafter, the defacto complainant can file a memo before the Jurisdictional Court giving her bank account details and that the petitioner shall directly remit the said amount every month, before the 10^th day of every English calendar month in the said bank account. Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on his appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Srivaikundam on his executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/(Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the petitioner shall appear before the respondent police as and when required for interrogation. The petitioner shall comply with the conditions stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. Scrupulously.

¶21

The petitioner shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail shall stand dismissed.

sd/-

25/04/2018

/ TRUE COPY /

Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

¶26

¶27

1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, SRIVAIKUNDAM, THOOTHUKUDI DISTRICT.

¶28

2 DO THROUGH THE CHIEF JUDCIAL MAGISTRATE, THOOTHUKUDI DISTRICT.

¶29

3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, ALL WOMEN POLICE STATION, SRIVAIKUNDAM, THOOTHUKUDI DISTRICT.

¶30

4 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

¶31

+1. CC to M/S.M.PRABU, Advocate SR.No.7098

¶32

ORDER

¶33

¶34

CRL OP(MD) No.4209 of 2018 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ Date :25/04/2018 PK/PMI/VK/08.05.2018 : 2P/6C

Kathiravan, v. the Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Kathiravan, v. the Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Manokaran Vs the Sub Inspector of Police

Vigneshkumar Vs the Sub Inspector of Police

Marimuthu Vs the Inspector of Police

Kannan, Vs the Inspector of Police

M.Malathi Vs the Inspector of Police

Periyasamy Alias Cattering Vs the Inspector of Police