Allowed

Vigneshkumar v. the Sub Inspector of Police

Madras HC24 Apr 2018CRL OP(MD)/6688/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner prayed for anticipatory bail fearing arrest for offences under IPC. Court granted anticipatory bail subject to execution of bond, appearance before police, and appearing in Magistrate court within 15 days.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner released on anticipatory bail with conditions to execute bond, appear before Magistrate within 15 days, and submit to police interrogation.

Vigneshkumar Vs the Sub Inspector of Police — Quashing and FIR | Madras HC (2018)

¶1

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction )

¶3

Tuesday, the Twenty Fourth day of April Two Thousand Eighteen

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

The Hon`ble Mr.Justice G.R.SWAMINATHAN

¶6

CRL OP(MD) No.6688 of 2018

¶7

VIGNESHKUMAR ... PETITIONER/ACCUSED No.1

¶8

STATE REP.BY,

¶9

THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, PERAIYUR POLICE STATION, PERAIYUR, MADURAI DISTRICT. CRIME NO.70/2018 ... RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT

¶10

For Petitioner : M/S.T.VADIVELAN, Advocate

¶11

For Respondent : M/S.A.ROBINSON, Government Advocate (Crl.Side)

¶12

PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C.

¶13

ORDER : The Court Made the following order :-

¶14

The petitioner apprehending arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under Sections 452, 294(b), 323, 353, 427 and 506(i) IPC, in Crime No.70 of 2018, seeks anticipatory bail.

¶15

2.The case of the prosecution is that on 13.04.2018 at 9.15 a.m., the petitioner and another went to the working place of the de-facto complainant and picked up quarrel with him regarding pathway issue and abused him in filthy language and also assaulted him.

¶16

3.It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner is an innocent person and he has not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution and prays for anticipatory bail in favour of the petitioner.

¶17

4.It is submitted by the learned Government Advocate (Criminal side) that the investigation is pending. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶18

5.Considering the nature of allegations set out in the FIR,

¶19

¶20

this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner with certain conditions. Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on his appearance before the learned District Munsif-cum-Judicial Magistrate, Peraiyur, and on his executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/(Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the petitioner shall appear before the respondent police as and when required for interrogation. The petitioner shall comply with the conditions stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. scrupulously.

¶21

6.The petitioner shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy is made ready, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail stands dismissed.

¶22

/ TRUE COPY /

¶23

Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court,

¶24

Madurai - 625 023.

¶25

¶26

1 THE DISTRICT MUSIF CUM JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, PERAIYUR, MADURAI DISTRICT.

¶27

2 DO THROUGH THE CHIEF JUDCIAL MAGISTRATE, MADURAI DISTRICT.

¶28

3 THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, PERAIYUR POLICE STATION, PERAIYUR, MADURAI DISTRICT.

¶29

4 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

¶30

+1. CC to M/S.T.VADIVELAN, Advocate SR.No.7121

¶31

PK/PMI/GSR/27.04.2018 : 2P/6C

¶32

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Vigneshkumar v. the Sub Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Vigneshkumar v. the Sub Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Pothiraj, Vs the Inspector of Police

D. Devadasan Vs the Inspector of Police

Ramasamy Vs Imam Oli

Manokaran Vs the Sub Inspector of Police

Marimuthu Vs the Inspector of Police

R. Sasikumar, S/O.Ramaraj, Vs the Inspector of Police