Allowed

Suresh, v. the Inspector of Police

Madras HC17 Apr 2018CRL OP(MD)/6167/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Madras High Court granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner seeking protection from arrest regarding theft offences. The order imposes conditions including appearance before a Magistrate and police within specified timelines and posting sureties.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner ordered to be released on bail in event of arrest upon executing bond for Rs. 10,000 with two sureties and complying with court conditions.

Suresh, Vs the Inspector of Police — Bail and Remand | Madras HC (2018)

¶1

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction )

¶3

Tuesday, the Seventeenth day of April Two Thousand Eighteen

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

The Hon`ble Mr.Justice G.R.SWAMINATHAN

¶6

CRL OP(MD) No.6167 of 2018

¶7

SURESH ... PETITIONER/ACCUSED No.2

¶8

¶9

STATE THROUGH,

¶10

THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, MUNEERPALLAM POLICE STATION, TIRUNELVELI DISTRICT.

¶11

(CRIME NO.126 OF 2018) ... RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT

¶12

For Petitioner : M/S.C.SARAVANAKUMAR, Advocate

¶13

For Respondent : M/S.A.ROBINSON, Government Advocate (Crl.Side)

¶14

PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C.

¶15

ORDER : The Court Made the following order :-

¶16

The petitioner apprehending arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under Sections 379 (sand) I.P.C., in Crime No.126 of 2018, seeks anticipatory bail.

¶17

2.Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner.

¶18

The learned Government Advocate (Criminal side) submitted that the property in question has been recovered. There is no previous case against the petitioner.

¶19

4.Taking note of the above said facts, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner with certain conditions. Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on his appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate No.V, Tirunelveli and on his executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the petitioner shall appear before the respondent police as and when required for

¶20

¶21

interrogation. The petitioner shall comply with the conditions stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. scrupulously.

¶22

5.The petitioner shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail shall stand dismissed.

¶23

sd/-

¶24

17/04/2018

¶25

/ TRUE COPY /

¶26

Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.)

¶27

Madurai Bench of Madras High Court,

¶28

Madurai - 625 023.

¶29

¶30

1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO.V, TIRUNELVELI DISTRICT.

¶31

2 DO THROUGH THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, TIRUNELVELI DISTRICT.

¶32

3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, MUNEERPALLAM POLICE STATION, TIRUNELVELI DISTRICT.

¶33

4 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

¶34

+1. CC to M/S.C.SARAVANAKUMAR Advocate SR.No.6329

¶35

ORDER

¶36

IN CRL OP(MD) No.6167 of 2018 Date :17/04/2018 PK/RR/VK/23.04.2018 : 2P/6C

¶37

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Suresh, v. the Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Suresh, v. the Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Kannan, Vs the Sub Inspector of Police

M.Chelladurai, Vs the Sub-Inspector of Police

T.Amuthan Vs the Deputy Superintendent of

Karuppasamy, Vs the Inspector of Police

Bose Vs the Inspector of Police

Dasan Vs the Sub Inspector of Police