Allowed

Kannan, v. the Sub Inspector of Police

Madras HC16 Apr 2018CRL OP(MD)/6060/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Madurai Bench of Madras High Court granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner apprehending arrest under IPC offences of assault, criminal intimidation and hurt. The court released the petitioner on bail conditioned upon executing a bond, producing sureties, and appearing for interrogation.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner released on bail with conditions to execute bond for Rs. 10,000, furnish two sureties for like sum, appear before Magistrate within 15 days, and comply with police interrogation requirement

Kannan, Vs the Sub Inspector of Police — Anticipatory Bail | Madras HC (2018)

¶1

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction )

¶3

Monday, the Sixteenth day of April Two Thousand Eighteen

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

The Hon`ble Mr.Justice G.R.SWAMINATHAN

¶6

CRL OP(MD) No.6060 of 2018

¶7

KANNAN ... PETITIONER / SOLE ACCUSED

¶8

THE STATE REPRESENTED BY THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, THIRUCHULI POLICE STATION, VIRUDHUNAGAR DISTRICT. (CRIME NO.78 OF 2018) ... RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT

¶9

For Petitioner : M/S.M.JOTHI BASU Advocate

¶10

For Respondent : Mr.A.ROBINSON, Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side)

¶11

PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C.

¶12

ORDER : The Court Made the following order :-

¶13

The petitioner apprehending arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 355, 323, 506(i) of IPC., in Crime No.78 of 2018, seeks anticipatory bail.

¶14

2.The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner assaulted the defacto complainant and threatened him with dire consequences.

¶15

3.The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is an innocent person and he has not committed any offences as alleged by the prosecution.

¶16

4.The learned Government Advocate (Criminal side) submitted that the injured was discharged from the hospital and no previous case is pending against the petitioner.

¶17

5.Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner with certain conditions. Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on his appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate Court, Aruppukottai and on his https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the

¶18

¶19

learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the petitioner shall appear before the respondent police as and when required for interrogation. The petitioner shall comply with the conditions stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. Scrupulously.

¶20

6.The petitioner shall appear before the concerned Magistrate

¶21

within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail shall stand dismissed.

¶22

sd/16/04/2018 / TRUE COPY /

¶23

Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.)

¶24

Madurai Bench of Madras High Court,

¶25

Madurai - 625 023.

¶26

¶27

1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, ARUPPUKOTTAI, VIRUDHUNAGAR DISTRICT

¶28

2 DO THROUGH THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, VIRUDHUNAGAR DISTRICT AT SRIVILLIPUTHUR

¶29

3 THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE,

¶30

THIRUCHULI POLICE STATION,

¶31

VIRUDHUNAGAR DISTRICT.

¶32

4 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI

¶33

+1. CC to M/S.M.JOTHI BASU Advocate SR.No.6285

¶34

DAS

¶35

JAM/19/04/2018/ CM-VR /RNB/ 2P-6C

¶36

ORDER IN

¶37

CRL OP(MD) No.6060 of 2018

¶38

Date :16/04/2018

¶39

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Kannan, v. the Sub Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Kannan, v. the Sub Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Veera Lakshmi Vs the Superintendent of Police

Pavul Arockiyaraj, Vs the Sub Inspector of Police

R.Markandan, Vs the Superintendent of Police

M.Chelladurai, Vs the Sub-Inspector of Police

T.Amuthan Vs the Deputy Superintendent of

S.Senthamilselvan, Vs the Inspector of Police