Allowed

M.Chelladurai, v. the Sub-Inspector of Police

Madras HC16 Apr 2018CRL OP(MD)/6058/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This judgment grants anticipatory bail to the petitioner apprehending arrest under multiple IPC sections and the Tamil Nadu Public Property Act. The court imposed conditions including a security deposit of Rs.10,000, execution of bond with sureties, appearance for interrogation, and a 15-day deadline to appear before the Magistrate.

What did the court decide?

The petitioner is released on bail in the event of arrest; directed to deposit Rs.10,000; release contingent upon executing bond with two sureties; must appear for interrogation; petition dismissed if

M.Chelladurai, Vs the Sub-Inspector of Police — Anticipatory Bail | Madras HC (2018)

¶1

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction )

¶3

Monday, the Sixteenth day of April Two Thousand Eighteen

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

The Hon`ble Mr.Justice G.R.SWAMINATHAN

¶6

CRL OP(MD) No.6058 of 2018

¶7

M.CHELLADURAI ... PETITIONER/2^nd ACCUSED

¶8

STATE REPRESENTED BY, THE SUB-INSPECTOR OF POLICE, SERNDAMARAM POLICE STATION, TIRUNELVELI DISTRICT. CRIME NO.71 OF 2018. ...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT

¶9

For Petitioner : M/S.S.KUMAR, Advocate

¶10

For Respondent : M/S.A.ROBINSON, Government Advocate (Crl.Side)

¶11

PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C.

¶12

ORDER : The Court Made the following order :-

¶13

The petitioner apprehending arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under Section 147, 294 (b), 427, 384 and 506(ii) of IPC and Section 3 of Tamil Nadu Public Property (Prevention of Damage and Loss) Act 1992, in Crime No.71 of 2018, seeks anticipatory bail.

¶14

2.There is no previous case registered against the petitioner. However taking into account of the fact that the value of damage is worth about Rs.70,000/-, the petitioner is directed to deposit a sum of Rs.10,000 (Ten Thousand Only) to the credit of the present F.I.R., before the Judicial Magistrate. The defacto complainant is entitled to withdraw the same.

¶15

3.Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner with certain conditions. Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on his appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Tenkasi, and on his executing a https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned

¶16

¶17

Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the petitioner shall appear before the respondent police as and when required for interrogation. The petitioner shall comply with the conditions stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. Scrupulously.

¶18

4.The petitioner shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail shall stand dismissed.

¶19

/ TRUE COPY /

¶20

Madurai Bench of Madras High Court,

¶21

¶22

1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, TENKASI, TIRUNELVELI DISTRICT.

¶23

2 DO THROUGH THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, TIRUNELVELI DISTRICT.

¶24

3 THE SUB-INSPECTOR OF POLICE,

¶25

SERNDAMARAM POLICE STATION, TIRUNELVELI DISTRICT.

¶26

4 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

¶27

+1. CC to M/S.S.KUMAR, Advocate SR.No.6268

¶28

CRL OP(MD) No.6058 of 2018

¶29

PK/CSL/VK/20.04.2018 : 2P/6C

¶30

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

M.Chelladurai, v. the Sub-Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

M.Chelladurai, v. the Sub-Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Veera Lakshmi Vs the Superintendent of Police

Pavul Arockiyaraj, Vs the Sub Inspector of Police

R.Markandan, Vs the Superintendent of Police

Kannan, Vs the Sub Inspector of Police

T.Amuthan Vs the Deputy Superintendent of

S.Senthamilselvan, Vs the Inspector of Police