Allowed

Pavul Arockiyaraj, v. the Sub Inspector of Police

Madras HC13 Apr 2018CRL OP(MD)/5891/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Madurai Bench of Madras High Court granted anticipatory bail to accused petitioners in a criminal miscarriage case under Sections 294(b), 323 and 506(i) I.P.C., ordering their release on a bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties and requiring appearance before police for interrogation.

What did the court decide?

Ordered release on bail in event of arrest or appearance before Magistrate upon executing bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties.

Pavul Arockiyaraj, Vs the Sub Inspector of Police — Anticipatory Bail | Madras HC (2018)

¶1

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction )

¶3

Friday, the Thirteenth day of April Two Thousand Eighteen

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

The Hon`ble Mr.Justice G.R.SWAMINATHAN

¶6

CRL OP(MD) No.5891 of 2018

¶7

1 PAVUL AROCKIYARAJ, 2 STALIN, ... PETITIONERS/ACCUSED Nos.1 & 2

¶8

¶9

THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, NATCHIYAPURAM POLICE STATION, SIVAGANGAI DISTRICT.

¶10

(CRIME NO.36 OF 2018) ... RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT

¶11

For Petitioner : M/S.P.VENKATA SUBRAMANIAN Advocate

¶12

For Respondent : MR.A.ROBINSON, Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side)

¶13

PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C.

¶14

ORDER : The Court Made the following order :-

¶15

The petitioners, who are arrayed as accused, apprehending arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under Sections 294(b), 323 and 506(i) I.P.C in Crime No.36 of 2018, on the file of the respondent police, seek anticipatory bail.

¶16

2.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners are innocent persons and they have not committed any of the offences as alleged by the prosecution.

¶17

The learned Government Advocate (Crl.side) appearing for the State submitted that injured was discharged from the hospital.

¶18

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners with certain conditions. Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on their appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Thirupattur, and on their executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ petitioners shall appear before the respondent police as and when required for interrogation. The petitioners shall comply with the

¶19

¶20

conditions stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. Scrupulously.

¶21

5.The petitioners shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy is made ready, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail shall stand dismissed.

¶22

sd/-

¶23

13/04/2018 / TRUE COPY /

¶24

Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court,

¶25

Madurai - 625 023.

¶26

¶27

1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, THIRUPATTUR

¶28

2 THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE SIVAGANGAI DISTRICT

¶29

3 THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, NATCHIYAPURAM POLICE STATION, SIVAGANGAI DISTRICT

¶30

4 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI

¶31

+1. CC to M/S.P.VENKATA SUBRAMANIAN Advocate SR.No.6156 ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.5891 of 2018 Date :13/04/2018 SDS/CM-VR/ASVM/20.04.2018:2P/6C

¶32

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Pavul Arockiyaraj, v. the Sub Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Pavul Arockiyaraj, v. the Sub Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

V.Swathick @ Anand, Vs the Inspector of Police

Ramamoorthy Vs the Inspector of Police

Sridhar Pappy, Vs the Inspector of Police

Thenmozhi, Vs the Inspector of Police

Maheswari, W/O.Mathi Vs the Inspector of Police

Sathatha Sri Vaishnava Vs the District Registrar