Allowed

Emily Parade Joshansan, v. the Inspector of Police

Madras HC19 Jun 2018CRL OP(MD)/5658/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Madurai Bench of Madras High Court granted anticipatory bail to two petitioners accused of dowry death and child sexual offences, releasing them upon recording of bond and compliance with police interrogation.

What did the court decide?

Petitioners released on bail upon executing a bond of Rs.10,000 each with two sureties for the same sum, subject to police interrogation conditions.

Emily Parade Joshansan, Vs the Inspector of… — Child Sexual Offences (POCSO) | Madras HC (2018)

¶1

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction )

¶3

Tuesday, the Nineteenth day of June Two Thousand Eighteen

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

The Hon`ble Mr.Justice G.R.SWAMINATHAN

¶6

CRL OP(MD) No.5658 of 2018

¶7

1 EMILY PARADE JOSHANSAN

¶8

2 JOHN IRUDHAYA JAYASTAN @ SILUVAI ... PETITIONERS/

¶9

ACCUSED No.1 & 2

¶10

Vs THE STATE REP.BY,

¶11

THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KOODANKULAM POLICE STATION, TIRUNELVELI DISTRICT.

¶12

CRIME NO.262/2017 ... RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT

¶13

For Petitioners : MR.S.SANKAR, Advocate

¶14

For Respondent : MR.A.ROBINSON, Government Advocate (Crl.Side)

¶15

PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C.

¶16

ORDER : The Court Made the following order :-

¶17

The petitioners are apprehending arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under Section 366-A of I.P.C., altered into Section 366-A of I.P.C and Section 8 of Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act 2012, in Crime No.262 of 2017, seek anticipatory bail.

¶18

2.Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the respondent.

¶19

3.The learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) submitted that it appears that this is a case of love affairs.

¶20

4.Taking note of the above said facts and circumstances, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners with certain conditions. Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on their appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Valliyoor and on their executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ each with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the

¶21

¶22

petitioners shall appear before the respondent police as and when required for interrogation. The petitioners shall comply with the conditions stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. scrupulously.

¶23

5.The petitioners shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail shall stand dismissed.

¶24

/ TRUE COPY /

¶25

Madurai Bench of Madras High Court,

¶26

¶27

1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, VALLIYOOR, TIRUNELVELI DISTRICT

¶28

2 DO THROUGH THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, TIRUNELVELI DISTRICT

¶29

3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KOODANKULAM POLICE STATION, TIRUNELVELI DISTRICT.

¶30

4 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

¶31

+1. CC to MR.S.SANKAR, Advocate SR.No.10741

¶32

CRL OP(MD) No.5658 of 2018 Date :19/06/2018 PK/RR-CSL/GSR/22.06.2018 : 2P/6C

¶33

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Emily Parade Joshansan, v. the Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Emily Parade Joshansan, v. the Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sanny Jospeh, S/O.Joseph, Vs the Inspector of Police

Vasanth Kumar Vs the Inspector of Police

Pandiarajan, Vs the Inspector of Police

Rajamohammed Vs Visalatchi

Manuvelraj Vs Paramasivam

Rathinam Vs the Inspector of Police