Allowed

Vasanth Kumar v. the Inspector of Police

Madras HC18 Jun 2018CRL OP(MD)/4612/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to petitioners facing arrest under Sections 294(b), 498(A) and 406 IPC in a matrimonial dispute pending before this court, subject to surety, interrogation conditions, and appearance before the magistrate within 15 days.

What did the court decide?

Petitioners ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest upon executing a bond for Rs. 10,000 with two common sureties, appearing for interrogation, and complying with Section 438 Cr.P.C. con

Vasanth Kumar Vs the Inspector of Police — Matrimonial and Divorce | Madras HC (2018)

¶1

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction )

¶3

Monday, the Eighteenth day of June Two Thousand Eighteen

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

The Hon`ble Mr.Justice G.R.SWAMINATHAN

¶6

CRL OP(MD) No.4612 of 2018

¶7

1 VASANTH KUMAR 2 ARUMUGAM 3 CHANDRA LAKSHMI ... PETITIONERS/ACCUSED

¶8

(RANK NOT KNOWN)

¶9

THE STATE REPRESENTED BY, THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, ALL WOMEN POLICE STATION, PUDUKOTTAI, THOOTHUKUDI DISTRICT. (*)CRIME NO.5/2018 ... RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT

¶10

For Petitioners : MR.A.THIRUVADI KUMAR, Advocate

¶11

For Respondent : MR.A.ROBINSON, Government Advocate (Crl.Side)

¶12

PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C.

¶13

ORDER : The Court Made the following order :-

¶14

The petitioners are apprehending arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under Sections (*)294(b), 498(A) and 406 of IPC, in Crime No. 5 of 2018, seek anticipatory bail.

¶15

2.Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the respondent.

¶16

The marriage between the first petitioner and the defacto complainant took place way back in the year 2004 and matrimonial proceedings are also pending between the parties. The defacto complainant is employed in a Panchayat Union Office.

¶17

4.Taking note of the above said facts and circumstances, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners with certain conditions. Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on their appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate Court No.III, Thoothukudi, https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ and on executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) each with two common sureties for a like sum to the

¶18

¶19

satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the petitioners shall appear before the respondent police as and when required for interrogation. The petitioners shall comply with the conditions stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. scrupulously.

¶20

5.The petitioners shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail shall stand dismissed.

¶21

sd/-

¶22

18/06/2018

¶23

(*)Amended as per order of this Hon’be Court made in Crl.MP(MD)No.2460/2018 in Crl.OP(MD) No.4612/2018 dated 28.03.2018.

¶24

/ TRUE COPY /

¶25

Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.)

¶26

Madurai Bench of Madras High Court,

¶27

Madurai - 625 023.

¶28

¶29

1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO III, THOOTHUKUDI.

¶30

2 DO THOUGH THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, THOOTHUKUDI.

¶31

3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, ALL WOMEN POLICE STATION, PUDUKOTTAI, THOOTHUKUDI DISTRICT.

¶32

4 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

¶33

+1. CC to MR.A.THIRUVADI KUMAR, Advocate SR.No.10701

¶34

ORDER

¶35

IN CRL OP(MD) No.4612 of 2018 Date :18/06/2018 PK/RR/GSR/22.06.2018 : 2P/6C

¶36

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Vasanth Kumar v. the Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Vasanth Kumar v. the Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

K.S.Arjunan Vs the Superintendent of Police

Kaliyamoorthy Vs the Inspector of Police

K. Subbiah Vs Pon. Gangadharan

Sanny Jospeh, S/O.Joseph, Vs the Inspector of Police

Pandiarajan, Vs the Inspector of Police

Muthuraj Vs the Inspector of Police