Allowed

Praveen v. the Inspector of Police

Madras HC11 Apr 2018CRL OP(MD)/5208/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner, who was apprehended of arrest for offences under IPC Sections 294(b) and 506(ii). The court ordered release on bail subject to executing a bond and appearing for interrogation.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner released on bail upon appearing before the Magistrate, executing a bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties, and complying with miscarriage of justice conditions.

Praveen Vs the Inspector of Police — Anticipatory Bail | Madras HC (2018)

¶1

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction )

¶2

Wednesday, the Eleventh day of April Two Thousand Eighteen

¶3

PRESENT

¶4

The Hon`ble Mr.Justice G.R.SWAMINATHAN

¶5

CRL OP(MD) No.5208 of 2018

¶6

PRAVEEN ... PETITIONER/1ST ACCUSED

¶7

¶8

THE STATE, REPRESENTED BY ITS, THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE PARAMAKUDI TOWN POLICE STATION, RAMANATHAPURAM DISTRICT (CRIME NO. 75 OF 2018) ... RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT

¶9

For Petitioner : M/S.M.S.JEYAKARTHIK Advocate

¶10

For Respondent : MR.A.ROBINSON, Government Advocate ( Crl. Side)

¶11

PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C.

¶12

ORDER : The Court Made the following order :-

¶13

The petitioner apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under Sections 294(b) & 506(ii) of I.P.C., in Crime No.75 of 2018, on the file of the respondent police and seeks anticipatory bail.

¶14

2.The case of the prosecution is that on 21.03.2018 at about 8 p.m., the petitioner along with other accused persons came and abused the defacto complainant by stating that the defacto complainant only gave information as against the petitioner and other accused persons to the respondent police and caused severe life threat to the defacto complainant with dire consequences. Hence, the case has been registered for the above said offences.

¶15

3.It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner is that the petitioner is innocent person and he has not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution and prays for anticipatory bail in favour of the petitioner.

¶16

The learned Government Advocate(Criminal Side) has opposed to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner on the ground that the petitioner is having previous case.

¶17

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 5. Considering the nature of allegations and facts and circumstances of this case, this Court is inclined to grant

¶18

anticipatory bail to the petitioner with certain conditions. Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on his appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Parmakudi, and executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the petitioner shall appear before the respondent police as and when required for interrogation. The petitioner shall comply with the conditions stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. Scrupulously.

¶19

The petitioner shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail shall stand dismissed.

¶20

sd/11/04/2018 / TRUE COPY /

¶21

Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

¶22

¶23

1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, PARAMAKUDI

¶24

2 THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE RAMANATHAPURAM DISTRICT

¶25

3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE PARAMAKUDI TOWN POLICE STATION, RAMANATHAPURAM DISTRICT

¶26

4 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

¶27

+1. CC to M/S.M.S.JEYAKARTHIK Advocate SR.No.5926

¶28

KAS

¶29

GJM/PMI/SAR-4-16.4.18-2P-6C

¶30

ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.5208 of 2018 Date :11/04/2018

¶31

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Praveen v. the Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Praveen v. the Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Manikandan Vs the Inspector of Police

S.Sivaramakrishnan Vs Inspector of Police

Eerudi Kumarraja, Vs the Inspector of Police

Balan Amstrang Vs S. Renganathan

Babu Vs the Inspector of Police

Ramesh @ Ramesh Pandi Vs the Inspector of Police