Partly allowed

Nagavalli, W/O.Ganesan, v. the Inspector of Police

Madras HC2 Apr 2018CRL OP(MD)/4879/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioners sought anticipatory bail under Section 438 Cr.P.C. apprehending arrest for offences under Sections 294(b), 324, and 506(i) IPC. The court granted bail to petitioners A1, A3, and A4 but excluded A2, imposing conditions including appearance before police and magistrate.

What did the court decide?

Anticipatory bail granted to petitioners A1, A3, and A4 on bond with sureties and conditions to appear before police and magistrate.

Nagavalli, W/O.Ganesan, Vs the Inspector of Police — Bail and Remand | Madras HC (2018)

¶1

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction )

¶2

Monday, the Second day of April Two Thousand and Eighteen

¶3

PRESENT

¶4

The Hon`ble Mr.Justice G.R.SWAMINATHAN

¶5

CRL OP(MD) No.4879 of 2018

¶6

1 NAGAVALLI 2 GOWSALYA @ RENUKA 3 VIMALA, W/O.PUSHBARAJ 4 KALPANA, W/O.MANI ... PETITIONERS / ACCUSED No.1 to 4 Vs

¶7

THE STATE REP. BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, NAINAR KOVIL POLICE STATION, RAMNAD DISTRICT. CR.NO.26 OF 2018. ... RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT

¶8

For Petitioner : M/S.R.BOOMINATHAN Advocate

¶9

For Respondent : A.P.G.OHM CHAIRMA PRABHU, Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side)

¶10

PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C.

¶11

ORDER : The Court Made the following order :-

¶12

The petitioners, who are arrayed as accused, apprehending arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under Sections 294(b), 324 & 506(i) IPC in Crime No.26 of 2018 on the file of the respondent police, seek anticipatory bail.

¶13

2.The case of the prosecution is that on 19.03.2018, there was a quarrel between the defacto complainant's son and the first petitioner. The defacto complainant questioned the act of the first petitioner. Thereafter, the petitioners abused the defacto complainant by using filthy languages and they attacked the defacto complainant by using wooden log. Hence, the present case has been registered against the petitioners herein.

¶14

3.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners are innocent persons and they have not committed any offences as alleged by the prosecution and that he https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ does not press this petition as regards the second petitioner, namely, Gowsalya.

¶15

4.The learned Government Advocate (Crl.side) appearing for the respondent police submitted that the injured has been discharged from the hospital.

¶16

5.Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners except A2, with certain conditions. Accordingly, the petitioners namely A1, A3 and A4 are ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on their appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Paramakudi and on their executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that above said petitioners namely A1, A3 and A4 shall appear before the respondent police as and when required for interrogation. The above said petitioners shall comply with the conditions stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. Scrupulously.

¶17

6.The above said petitioners shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail shall stands dismissed.

sd/-

02/04/2018

/ TRUE COPY /

Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.)

¶22

Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

¶23

¶24

1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE,

¶25

PARAMAKUDI, RAMANATHAPURAM DISTRICT.

¶26

2 THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE,

¶27

RAMANATHAPURAM DISTRICT.

¶28

3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE,

¶29

NAINAR KOVIL POLICE STATION, RAMNAD DISTRICT.

¶30

4 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,

¶31

MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

¶32

+1. CC to M/S.M.S.JEYAKARTHIK, Advocate SR.No.5260

¶33

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶34

SDS/CM:VR/SAR.1/03.04.2018/2P/6C

Nagavalli, W/O.Ganesan, v. the Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Nagavalli, W/O.Ganesan, v. the Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

G. Raghavalu Vs Additional General

M/S.Mmr Gardens Vs the Commissioner of Income

V.Subramanian,S/O.R.Velayutham Vs the State of Tamilnadu

Kasi Manavalan Vs the Sub Inspector of Police

Baskar, Vs the Inspector of Police

Tmt. M. Vijayalakshmi Vs Mr. B. Mohan