Bala Murugan v. the Inspector of Police
Case brief
What is this about?
The Court allowed a Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 CrPC to quash a Charge Sheet. The quashing was based on a Joint Compromise Memo signed by the petitioners and the complainant, who verified the agreement appeared voluntary.
What did the court decide?
The Charge Sheet in S.C.No.67 of 2016 on the file of the Subordinate Court, Mudukulathur, was quashed.
What the court decided
1
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED: 14.02.2018 CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.RAJAMANICKAM
Crl.O.P.(MD) No.2290 of 2018
1.Bala Murugan
2.Murugakani ... Petitioners/ Accused No.1 & 2
-Vs-
- 1.The State Represented by its, The Inspector of Police, Ilamchembur Police Station, Ramanathapuram District.
(Crime No.10 of 2016)
... 1st Respondent/Complainant
2.Chandran ... 2nd Respondent/ Defacto Complainant
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the Charge Sheet under Sections 294(b), 323, 506(ii) and 307 IPC should be quashed on the filing of a Joint Compromise Memo.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Bala Murugan
- petitioner
Murugakani
- respondent
The State Represented by its, The Inspector of Police, Ilamchembur Police Station, Ramanathapuram District.
- respondent
Chandran
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court