Dismissed

A.Marimuthupandiyan v. the Inspector of Police

Madras HC13 Feb 2018CRL OP(MD)/1329/2014

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court dismissed a Criminal Original Petition under Section 482 CrPC filed by an accused to quash an FIR involving Sections 498A and 506 IPC. The court held the petition infructuous because the charge sheet had already been filed.

What did the court decide?

The Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 CrPC was dismissed as infructuous due to the filing of the charge sheet.

A.Marimuthupandiyan Vs the Inspector of Police — Dowry and Cruelty | Madras HC (2018)

¶1

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED: 13.02.2018

¶4

CORAM:

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.RAJAMANICKAM

¶6

CRL.O.P.(MD)No.1329 of 2014 and MP(MD)No.1 of 2014

¶7

A.Marimuthupandiyan : Petitioner/Sole Accused

¶8

-Vs-

¶9

State represented by The Inspector of Police, All Women Police Station,

¶10

Aruppukottai, Virudhunagar. ...Respondent/Complainant (Crime No.38 of 2013)

¶11

2.S.Solaipriya ...Respondent/Defacto Complainant

¶12

PRAYER: Petition is filed under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code, to call for the records pertaining to the First Information Report in Crime No.38 of 2013 dated 21.11.2013 on the file of the first respondent police alleged offence under Sections 498(A), 506(i), 323, of I.P.C r/w Section 4 of Dowry Prohibition Act and quash the same as illegal.

¶13

For Petitioner : Mr.T.Lajapathi Roy For 1^st Respondent : Mr.A.P.G.Ohm Chairma Prabhu Government Advocate (Crl.side)

¶14

O R D E R

¶15

This Criminal Original Petition has been filed by the accused to quash the F.I.R., in Crime No.38 of 2013 for offences punishable under Sections 498(A), 506(i), 323, of I.P.C r/w Section 4 of Dowry Prohibition Act.

¶16

2.Heard, Mr.T.Lajapathi Roy, the learned counsel appearing for https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ the petitioner and Mr.A.P.G.Ohm Chairma Prabhu, learned Government Advocate (Crl.side) appearing for the first respondent.

¶17

¶18

3.The learned Government Advocate(Crl.side) has submitted that already charge sheet has been filed and the same was taken on file in C.C.No.52 of 2015 on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate No.1, Aruppukkottai.

¶19

4.Recording the aforesaid submissions, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed as infructuous. Consequently, connected MP(MD) No.1 of 2014, is closed.

¶20

Sd/-

¶21

Assistant Registrar(CS-II)

¶22

/True Copy/

¶23

Sub Assistant Registrar

¶24

¶25

The Inspector of Police,

¶26

All Women Police Station,

¶27

Aruppukottai, Virudhunagar.

¶28

The Additional Public Prosecutor,

¶29

Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

¶30

das

¶31

MV:GT:SAR2:13/03/2018/2P/3C

¶32

CRL.O.P.(MD)No.1329 of 2014

¶33

and MP(MD)No.1 of 2014

¶34

13.02.2018

¶35

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

A.Marimuthupandiyan v. the Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

A.Marimuthupandiyan v. the Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Chandru Vs the Inspector of Police

S.Syed Abuthahir, Vs the Inspector of Police

Manoj @ Monojkumar, Vs the Inspector of Police

Muthupappa Vs the Inspector of Police

Ponraj Vs the Inspector of Police

Jesiy Jhonsi @ Jesi Jancy Vs the Inspector of Police