The petitioner sought withdrawal of a criminal petition filed under Section 482 CrPC to quash proceedings. Noting the withdrawal endorsement, the court dismissed the petition and closed the connected miscellaneous petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED: 13.02.2018
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.RAJAMANICKAM
CRL.O.P.(MD)No.1291 of 2014 and M.P.(MD) No.1 of 2014
Muthupappa ... Petitioner/Accused No.4
-Vs-
Gangaikondan Police Station, (Crime No.182 of 2013) ...1st Respondent/Complainant
2.Kovil Pitchai ...2nd Respondent/Defacto Complainant
PRAYER: Petition is filed under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code, to call for the records relating to the proceedings in Crime No.182 of 2013 on the file of the first respondent and quash the same, in so far as the petitioner is concerned.
For Petitioner : Mr.T.Antony Arul Raj For 1st Respondent : Mr.A.P.G.Ohm Chairma Prabhu Government Advocate (Crl.side)
O R D E R
When the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this petition and he has also made an endorsement to that effect.
Sd/Assistant Registrar(P&A) /True Copy/
Sub Assistant Registrar
2
To
das
AE/GT/SAE3/05.03.2018 : 2P/3C
CRL.O.P.(MD)No.1291 of 2014 13.2.2018
Muthupappa
State represented by The Inspector of Police, Gangaikondan Police Station
Kovil Pitchai
P.RAJAMANICKAM
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
