Allowed

Bakiyarasu @ Backiyaraj v. the Inspector of Police

Madras HC10 Oct 2018CRL OP(MD)/17934/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Madurai Bench of Madras High Court granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner, apprehending arrest for offences relating to conducting Jallikattu without permission. The petitioner is released on a bond of Rs.10,000/- with two sureties and must appear for interrogation.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner ordered to be released on bail upon appearance before the Magistrate, execution of a bond of Rs.10,000/- with two sureties, and compliance with conditions under Section 438 Cr.P.C.

Bakiyarasu @ Backiyaraj Vs the Inspector of Police — Dowry and Cruelty | Madras HC (2018)

¶1

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction )

¶3

Wednesday, the Tenth day of October Two Thousand Eighteen

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

The Hon`ble Mr.Justice G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN

¶6

CRL OP(MD) No.17934 of 2018

¶7

BAKIYARASU @ BACKIYARAJ ... PETITIONER / 1st ACCUSED

¶8

¶9

STATE THROUGH

¶10

THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KEELAKARAI POLICE STATION, RAMANATHAPURAM DISTRICT,

¶11

(IN CRIME NO.132/2018) ... RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT

¶12

For Petitioner : Mr.R.RAMACHANDRAN Advocate

¶13

For Respondent : Mr.V.NEELAKANDAN,

¶14

Additional Public Prosecutor

¶15

PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C.

¶16

ORDER : The Court Made the following order :-

¶17

The petitioner apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under Sections 143, 188 and 289 IPC r/w Section 24 of Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act, 1960, in Crime No.132 of 2018, seeks anticipatory bail.

¶18

2.The case of the prosecution is that on 26.09.2018, the petitioner and other villagers were conducting Jallikattu on the eve of Arulmigu Sri Alaguputhira Ayyanar Temple festival without getting any permission from any authority. Hence, the complaint.

¶19

3.The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner is innocent and he has not committed any offence as alleged by the defacto complainant. Therefore, he seeks anticipatory bail.

¶20

4.Heard the learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the State.

¶21

5.Considering the facts and circumstances of this case, this https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner with certain conditions. Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be

¶22

¶23

released on bail in the event of arrest or on his appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate No.I, Ramanathapuram, and on his executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the petitioner shall appear before the respondent police as and when required for interrogation. The petitioner shall comply with the conditions stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. scrupulously.

¶24

6.The petitioner shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail shall stand dismissed.

¶25

sd/10/10/2018

¶26

/ TRUE COPY /

¶27

Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

¶28

¶29

1.THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO.I, RAMANATHAPURAM.

¶30

2.DO THRO'THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, RAMANATHAPURAM DISTRICT

¶31

3.THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KEELAKARAI POLICE STATION, RAMANATHAPURAM DISTRICT.

¶32

4.THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

¶33

+1. CC to MR.S.VICKRAM, Advocate in SR.No.19398

¶34

ORDER

¶35

IN CRL OP(MD) No.17934 of 2018 Date :10/10/2018 mm AE/RR/SAR1/16.10.2018/2P/6C

¶36

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Bakiyarasu @ Backiyaraj v. the Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Bakiyarasu @ Backiyaraj v. the Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

B.Ramesh Kumar Vs R.Rajkumar

Ariyappan Vs the Inspector of Police

D.Balakumar Vs P.Periannan

Jeyalakshmi Vs the Inspector of Police

Arunkumar Vs the Inspector of Police

Kanagaraj Vs the Inspector of Police