Allowed

Arunkumar v. the Inspector of Police

Madras HC10 Oct 2018CRL OP(MD)/18148/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Madras High Court granted anticipatory bail to six accused persons facing charges related to dowry harassment and cruelty. The petitioners alleged false implication. The court ordered release upon execution of a bond with sureties and appearance before police and magistrates as specified.

What did the court decide?

Anticipatory bail granted conditioned upon execution of bond, appearance before police for interrogation, and appearance before Magistrate within 15 days.

Arunkumar Vs the Inspector of Police — Dowry and Cruelty | Madras HC (2018)

¶1

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction )

¶3

Wednesday, the Tenth day of October Two Thousand and Eighteen

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

The Hon`ble Mr.Justice G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN

¶6

CRL OP(MD) No.18148 of 2018

¶7

1.ARUNKUMAR

¶8

2.RAJAKUMARAN

¶9

3.BABY SAROJA 4.ANUSHIYA

¶10

5.SARJAN 6.JEBARAJ ... PETITIONERS / ACCUSED NOS.1 TO 6

¶11

STATE REPRESENTED BY, THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, ALL WOMEN POLICE STATION, NAGERCOIL, KANYAKUMARI DISTRICT, (CRIME NO.45 OF 2018) ... RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT

¶12

For Petitioners : Mr.C.MAYILVAHANA RAJENDRAN, Advocate.

¶13

For Respondent : Mr.V.NEELAKANDAN, Additional Public Prosecutor.

¶14

PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C.

¶15

ORDER : The Court Made the following order :-

¶16

The petitioners apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under Sections 498(A) 406, 506(i) IPC and Section 4 and 6 of Dowry Prohibition Act, in Crime No.45 of 2018, seek anticipatory bail.

¶17

2.The case of the prosecution is that the defacto complainant was harassed by the first petitioner on the instigation of the other petitioners for want of further dowry. Hence, the complaint.

¶18

3.The learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that the petitioners are innocent persons and they have been falsely implicated in this case. It is a case of case in counter. Hence, https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ he prays for anticipatory bail to the petitioners.

¶19

¶20

4.Heard the learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

¶21

5.Considering the facts and circumstances of this case, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners with certain conditions. Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on their appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Additional Mahila Court, Nagercoil and on their executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/(Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the first petitioner shall appear before the respondent police for a period of two weeks and thereafter, as and when required for interrogation and the petitioners 2 to 6 shall appear before the respondent police as and when required for interrogation. The petitioners shall comply with the conditions stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. scrupulously.

¶22

6.The petitioners shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail shall stand dismissed as against the petitioners.

¶23

/ TRUE COPY /

¶24

Madurai Bench of Madras High Court,

¶25

¶26

1.THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, ADDITIONAL MAHILA COURT, NAGERCOIL.

¶27

2.DO THROUGH THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, KANYAKUMARI AT NAGERCOIL.

¶28

3.THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE ALL WOMEN POLICE STATION, NAGERCOIL, KANYAKUMARI DISTRICT.

¶29

4.THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

¶30

+1. CC to Mr.C.MAYILVAHANA RAJENDRAN, Advocate, SR.No.19367.

¶31

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶32

CRL OP(MD) No.18148 of 2018

¶33

RAM/RR/SAR 4/15.10.2018/2P/6C

Arunkumar v. the Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Arunkumar v. the Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

B.Ramesh Kumar Vs R.Rajkumar

Ariyappan Vs the Inspector of Police

D.Balakumar Vs P.Periannan

Jeyalakshmi Vs the Inspector of Police

Kanagaraj Vs the Inspector of Police

Murugan Vs the Inspector of Police