Allowed

Kanagaraj v. the Inspector of Police

Madras HC10 Oct 2018CRL OP(MD)/18144/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court granted anticipatory bail to the petitioners facing charges under IPC and the Dowry Prohibition Act. The court imposed conditions including a bond, appearance before judicial authorities, and compliance with interrogation requirements.

What did the court decide?

Anticipatory bail granted subject to executing a bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties, appearing before the Magistrate within 15 days, and complying with police interrogation.

Kanagaraj Vs the Inspector of Police — Dowry and Cruelty | Madras HC (2018)

¶1

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction )

¶3

Wednesday, the Tenth day of October Two Thousand Eighteen

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

The Hon`ble Mr.Justice G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN

¶6

CRL OP(MD) No.18144 of 2018

¶7

1 KANAGARAJ

¶8

2 SHAILAJA

¶9

... PETITIONERS/ ACCUSED NO.5 & 6

¶10

¶11

STATE REP.BY

¶12

THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, ALL WOMEN POLICE STATION, THIRUMANGALAM, MADURAI DISTRICT. CRIME NO.32 OF 2018 ... RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT

¶13

For Petitioners: Mr.R.GANDHI, Advocate

¶14

For Respondent : Mrs.ANANTHA DEVI, Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side)

¶15

For Intervenor : Mr.PORKODI KARNAN, Advocate

¶16

PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C.

¶17

ORDER : The Court Made the following order :-

¶18

The petitioners apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under Sections 498(A), 406, 420, 294(b) and 506(ii) IPC and Section 4 of Dowry Prohibition Act in Crime No.32 of 2018, seek anticipatory bail.

¶19

2.The case of the prosecution is that the defacto complainant was harassed by the petitioners for demanding more dowry. Hence, the complaint.

¶20

3.Heard the learned counsel on either side.

¶21

4.Considering the facts and circumstances of this case, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners with certain conditions. Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on their appearance before the Judicial Magistrate Court, Thirunamgalam, and on their executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the petitioners shall appear before the respondent police as and when

¶22

¶23

required for interrogation. The petitioners shall comply with the conditions stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. scrupulously.

¶24

5.The petitioners shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail shall stand dismissed.

¶25

/ TRUE COPY /

¶26

Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

¶27

¶28

THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, THIRUMANGALAM.

¶29

DO-THROUGH THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, MADURAI DISTRICT.

¶30

THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE,

¶31

ALL WOMEN POLICE STATION, THIRUMANGALAM, MADURAI DISTRICT.

¶32

THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

¶33

+1. CC to Mr.R.GANDHI Advocate SR.No.19578 +1CC TO Mr.POLAX LEGAL SOLUTIONS, Advocate, SR NO.19320

¶34

MS/PN/SAR-2/15.10.2018/2P.7C

¶35

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Kanagaraj v. the Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Kanagaraj v. the Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

B.Ramesh Kumar Vs R.Rajkumar

Ariyappan Vs the Inspector of Police

D.Balakumar Vs P.Periannan

Jeyalakshmi Vs the Inspector of Police

Arunkumar Vs the Inspector of Police

Murugan Vs the Inspector of Police