Disposed

Manoj @ Monojkumar, v. the Inspector of Police

Madras HC12 Feb 2018CRL OP(MD)/2026/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

A single-judge bench of the Madurai Bench disposed of a Criminal Original Petition filed by an accused under Section 482 CrPC. The court observed the case was ready for trial and directed the Principal District and Sessions Judge to dispose of it within four months.

What did the court decide?

Directed the Principal District and Sessions Judge, Theni, to dispose of the case in S.C.No.28 of 2017 within four months.

Manoj @ Monojkumar, Vs the Inspector of Police — Madras HC (2018) — LawSathi Research

¶1

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED: 12.02.2018

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE P.RAJAMANICKAM

¶6

Crl.O.P.(MD) No.2026 of 2018

¶7

Manoj @ Manojkumar ... Petitioner/ Accused No.3

¶8

-Vs-

¶9

The Inspector of Police, Palanichettipatti Police Station, Theni District.

¶10

(In Cr.No.936 of 2015) ... Respondent/ Respondent/ Complainant

¶11

Prayer: Criminal Original petition filed under Section 482 of Code of Criminal Procedure, to direct the learned Principal District and Sessions, Judge, Theni to dispose of the case in S.C.No.28 of 2017 registered in Cr.No.936 of 2015 for alleged offences under Section 120(b) and Section 3 (i) of TNPPDL Act as expeditiously as possible and within the time stipulated by this Court.

¶12

For Petitioner : Mr.J.Lawrance For Respondent : Mr.Prabu Ramachandran Government Advocate(Crl.side)

¶13

O R D E R

¶14

This petition has been filed to direct the learned Principal District and Sessions Judge, Theni, to dispose of the case in S.C.No.28 of 2017 at early.

¶15

2.The learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the respondent has registered the case in the year 2015 in Cr.No.936 of 2015 under Section 120 (b) IPC and Section 3(1) TNPPDL Act and in the First Information Report his name has not been mentioned. However, the respondent has filed a charge sheet implicating the petitioner also as accused. Based on that, the case has been taken on file by the Judicial Magistrate, Theni, in PRC.No.5 of 2016 and subsequently, committed the case to the Court of Sessions and the same has been taken on file in S.C.No.38 of 2017, by the Principal District and Sessions Judge and the said https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ case is still pending for trial. He further submitted that the petitioner is a law graduate and because of this case, he is not

¶16

¶17

able to enroll and hence, a direction may be given to the Principal District and Sessions Judge, Theni to dispose of the said case at early.

¶18

3.The learned Government Advocate (Crl.side) has submitted that NBW is pending against the first accused and hence, the case cannot be taken for trial.

¶19

4.The Diary extract produced by the petitioner shows that on 29.11.2017, A1 surrendered and NBW was recalled and thereafter, the case has been posted for trial. So it appears that the case is ready for trial.

¶20

5.Considering the submissions made on either side, the Principal District and Sessions Judge, Theni, is directed to expedite the trial in the aforesaid case and dispose of the same within a period of four months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

¶21

6.With the aforesaid observation, this criminal original petition is disposed of.

¶22

Sd/Assistant Registrar(Crl side)

¶23

/True Copy/

¶24

Sub Assistant Registrar

¶25

¶26

The Principal District and Sessions Judge, Theni.

¶27

The Inspector of Police, Palanichettipatti Police Station, Theni District.

¶28

3.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

¶29

1 cc TO Mr.J.Lawrance , Advocate in SR No. 47988

¶30

rmk

¶31

AE/JC/SAR2/12.03.2018/2P/5C

¶32

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶33

Crl.O.P.(MD) No.2026 of 2018 12.02.2018

Manoj @ Monojkumar, v. the Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Manoj @ Monojkumar, v. the Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Jinna Mohammed Vs the Inspector of Police

Semraj, Vs the Superintendent of Police

M.Rajeshwari, Vs the Superintendent of Police

Chandru Vs the Inspector of Police

S.Syed Abuthahir, Vs the Inspector of Police

D.Shaji, Vs the Inspector of Police