The petitioner filed a petition for anticipatory bail under Section 438 Cr.P.C. The court observed that the petitioner had already been arrested by the police. Consequently, the petition was dismissed as infructuous.
The petition for anticipatory bail was dismissed as the petitioner had already been arrested.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
( Criminal Jurisdiction )
Tuesday, the Sixteenth day of October Two Thousand Eighteen PRESENT
The Hon`ble Mr Justice N. ANAND VENKATESH
CRIMINAL ORIGINAL PETITION No.24448 of 2018
CHANDRAN @ BABU [ PETITIONER / ACCUSED ]
Vs STATE REP.BY, [ RESPONDENT ] THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, TOWN TALUK STATION, THIRUVANNAMALAI, THIRUVANNAMALAI DISTRICT. CR.NO.1292 OF 2018.
For Petitioner : M/S.T.SHANMUGAM Advocate
For Respondent : M/S.KRITIKA KAMAL P. Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :-
It is submitted by the learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) that the petitioner has already been arrested by the respondent police on 12.10.2018.
-sd/16/10/2018
This order, on being produced, be punctually observed and carried into execution by all concerned
TRUE COPY
Sub-Assistant Registrar (Statistics/C.S.) High Court, Madras - 600 104.
TO
1 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, TOWN TALUK STATION, THIRUVANNAMALAI, THIRUVANNAMALAI DISTRICT.
2 THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT, MADRAS.
CC to M/S.T.SHANMUGAM Advocate on payment of necessary charges
CRL OP.24448/2018
Date :16/10/2018
MK-23/10/2018
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petition for anticipatory bail becomes infructuous after the petitioner's arrest.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
CHANDRAN @ BABU
STATE
N. ANAND VENKATESH
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
