Allowed

Karuppaiah @ Karuppu v. the Deputy Superintendent of

Madras HC12 Oct 2018CRL OP(MD)/18489/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Madurai Bench considered a Criminal Original Petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. for bail. Due to SC/ST Act amendments, standard directions were deemed inapplicable. The court directed surrender within two weeks and required the trial court to hear the bail application on the same day after notifying victims.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner directed to surrender within two weeks; trial court to hear bail application on same day after issuing notice to victims under Section 15-A SC/ST Act.

Karuppaiah @ Karuppu Vs the Deputy Superintendent of — Caste Atrocities | Madras HC (2018)

¶1

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 12.10.2018 CORAM

¶3

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N.ANAND VENKATESH CRL.O.P.(MD) No.18489 of 2018

¶4

Karuppaiah @ Karuppu ... Petitioner/Accused No.1

¶5

¶6

1.The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Aruppukottai, Virudhunagar District.

¶7

2.The State represented by Inspector of Police, Thiruchuli Police Station, Virudhunagar District. Crime No.192 of 2018.

¶8

Crime No.192 of 2018. ... Respondents 1 and 2/Complainant 3.Periyal ... 3^rd Respondent/Defacto Complainant 4.Ramachandran ... 4th Respondent/Victim

¶9

PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C, praying, to permit the petitioner to surrender before the Principal District and Sessions Court (PCR), Virudhunagar in connection with Crime No.192 of 2018 on the file of the second respondent police and file an application for the grant of bail on the same day and in the event of filing the same, the said application may be directed to be considered on the same day on merits and in accordance with law.

¶10

For Petitioner : Mr.M.Jegadeesh Pandian For R1 & R2 : Mr.K.Suyambulinga Bharathi Government Advocate (Crl.Side)

¶11

O R D E R

¶12

In view of the amendments made in the Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989, this Court is of the view that the usual directions that were issued by this court cannot be issued routinely in all cases. Therefore, the petitioner

¶13

is directed to surrender before the trial Court within a period of https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order and on

¶14

¶15

such surrender, the Principal District and Sessions Court (PCR) Virudhunagar, shall deal with the matter on the same day on merits and in accordance with law, after issuing notice to the victims under Sections 15-A of the SC/ST Act.

¶16

2.This criminal Original Petition is disposed of with the above directions.

¶17

Sd/ Assistant Registrar /True copy/

¶18

Sub Assistant Registrar(CS-I) To

¶19

1.The Principal District and Sessions Judge, PCR Court, Virudhunagar.

¶20

2.The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Aruppukottai, Virudhunagar District.

¶21

3.The Inspector of Police, Thiruchuli Police Station, Virudhunagar District.

¶22

4.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

¶23

+1cc to Mr.M.JEGADEESH PANDYAN, Advocate, SR.No. 90357

¶24

CRL.O.P.(MD)No.18489 of 2018 12.10.2018

¶25

¶26

KK/RP/SAR-1/22.11.2018/2P-6C

¶27

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Karuppaiah @ Karuppu v. the Deputy Superintendent of

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Karuppaiah @ Karuppu v. the Deputy Superintendent of

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Rajendran, Vs the Inspector of Police

Muthulakshmi, Vs State of Tamil Nadu

Kalai Eswari, Vs State of Tamil Nadu

Kalidass Vs the Sub Inspector of Police

Hindu Primary School Vs the Superintendent of Police

M. Sivaramakrishnan, Vs the Superintendent of Police