Venkatesan (50) Years, v. State Rep. by
Case brief
What is this about?
The petitioner sought anticipatory bail under Section 438 Cr.P.C. but withdrew the petition. The Court dismissed the petition as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
( Criminal Jurisdiction )
Friday, the Twenty Seventh day of July Two Thousand Eighteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr Justice A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA CRIMINAL ORIGINAL PETITION No.16629 of 2018
VENKATESAN [ PETITIONER / ACCUSED ]
Vs STATE REP. BY [ RESPONDENT ] INSPECTOR OF POLICE, DISTRICT CRIME BRANCH, KRISHNAGIRI, KRISHNAGIRI DISTIRCT. CR.NO.NOT KNOWN OF 2018
For Petitioner : M/S.MA.GOUTHAMAN Advocate
For Respondent : MR.M.MOHAMED RIYAZ, ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :-
The learned Counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the petition and he has also made an endorsement to that effect.
This order, on being produced, be punctually observed and carried into execution by all concerned
Sub-Assistant Registrar (Statistics/C.S.) High Court, Madras - 600 104.
TO
1 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, DISTRICT CRIME BRANCH, KRISHNAGIRI, KRISHNAGIRI DISTIRCT.
2 THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT, MADRAS.
CC to M/S.MA.GOUTHAMAN Advocate on payment of necessary charges
CRL OP.16629/2018
Date :27/07/2018
MK:01/08/2018
Venkatesan
State Rep. by Inspector of Police, District Crime Branch, Krishnagiri
A.D. Jagadish
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court