Partly allowed

L.Mohan, M/a 40 Years, v. the State Rep by Its

Madras HC26 Jul 2018CRL MP/9595/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This criminal miscellaneous petition sought relaxation of a condition requiring the petitioner to report to police daily at 10:30 a.m. The High Court modified the condition, directing the petitioner to report once a week, specifically on Saturdays at the same time, citing hearing of arguments.

What did the court decide?

The condition of daily reporting was modified to require reporting once a week every Saturday at 10:30 a.m.

L.Mohan, M/a 40 Years, Vs the State Rep by Its — Bail and Remand | Madras HC (2018)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

( Criminal Jurisdiction )

¶3

Thursday, the Twenty Sixth day of July Two Thousand Eighteen

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

The Hon`ble Mr Justice A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS PETITION No.9595 of 2018

¶6

IN CRL OP.16596/2018

¶7

L.MOHAN [ PETITIONER ]

¶8

¶9

THE STATE REP BY ITS, [ RESPONDENT ] THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, J-1 SAIDAPET POLICE STATION, CHENNAI CR.NO.531 OF 2018.

¶10

Petition praying that in the circumstances stated therein the High Court will be pleased to relax the condition the petitioner shall report before the respondent police daily at 10.30 a.m until further orders imposed in Crl.O.P.No.16596 of 2018 by order dated 28.06.2018.

¶11

Order : This petition coming on for orders upon perusing the petition and upon hearing the arguments of M/S.R.VIVEKANANTHAN, Advocate for the petitioner and of MR. M.MOHAMED RIYAZ, ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR on behalf of the Respondent the court made the following order:-

¶12

Petition for relaxation of the bail condition imposed in Crl.O.P.No.16596 of 2018 dated 28.06.2018.

¶13

This court, while granting bail to the petitioner, imposed a condition that the petitioner shall report before the respondent police daily at 10.30.a.m., until further orders. The present petition has been filed for relaxation of the said condition.

¶14

Heard both sides.

¶15

The condition imposed on the petitioner in Crl.O.P.No.16596 of 2018 dated 28.06.2018 is modified to the effect that the petitioner is directed to report before the respondent police once

¶16

in a week, i.e., every Saturday at 10.30.a.m. until further orders .

¶17

-sd/-

¶18

26/07/2018

¶19

This order, on being produced, be punctually observed and carried into execution by all concerned

¶20

TRUE COPY

¶21

Sub-Assistant Registrar (Statistics/C.S.) High Court, Madras - 600 104.

¶22

¶23

1 THE XVII METROPOLITAN MAGISTRATE, SAIDAPET, CHENNAI.

¶24

2 THE CHIEF METROPOLITAN MAGISTRATE, EGMORE, CHENNAI. [FOR INFORMATION]

¶25

3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, J-1 SAIDAPET POLICE STATION, CHENNAI.

¶26

4 THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT, MADRAS.

¶27

+1C.C. to M/S.R.VIVEKANANTHAN Advocate on payment of necessary charges in SR.NO. 13962

CRL MP.9595/2018

in CRL OP.16596/2018

Date :26/07/2018

From 7.2.2001 the Registry is issuing certified copies of the BAIL/Anti.BAIL Orders in this format MLT-31/07/2018

L.Mohan, M/a 40 Years, v. the State Rep by Its

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

L.Mohan, M/a 40 Years, v. the State Rep by Its

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Kathiravan, Aged 28 Years Vs State Rep. by

M.Shamla, Aged 33 Years Vs State by

Vasanthamani, F/67 Years Vs State Rep by

Palanivel, M/a 45 Yrs, Vs the Inspector of Police

Karunamoorthy, S/O.Devaraj Vs State Rep by

S.Jayakumar, M/A.43 Years Vs State Rep by