2 . The case of the prosecution as per the defacto complainant one Francis Rani is that she got acquainted with Vinoth Kumar (A1) during the year 2009 and that from the year 2010, they became close and living as husband and wife and thereby, she became pregnant during the year 2011 and when she had insisted the first accused to marry her, he had told that his elder sister has not been married and thereby, asked her to abort her pregnancy. On 07.04.2011 she aborted the pregnancy in the hospital and the first accused signed as husband. The further allegation is that from the year 2010, the first accused had taken the entire salary of the defacto complainant and that he had been transferring the amount in the account of his family members. The further allegation is that the first accused had asked her to convert to his religion. While so, on 02.05.2018, the defacto complainant received an information that the first accused got engaged to one Vijayalakshmi at Trichy and when she had called the first accused over phone, he had disconnected the phone and thereafter, he had not spoken to her. The further allegation is that on 03.05.2018, the first accused along with the petitioners herein have gone to the house of the defacto complainant and threatened her.
