Disposed

P.Krishnamoorthy, v. the Inspector of Police

Madras HC17 May 2018CRL OP/13889/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

A short order directed the respondent police to consider the petitioner's representation seeking police protection and permission to conduct a temple festival and cultural programme and to dispose thereof before the programme date in view of a pending law and order problem.

What did the court decide?

The respondent police is directed to consider the petitioner's representation and pass appropriate orders before the date of the programme.

P.Krishnamoorthy, Vs the Inspector of Police — Service and Employment | Madras HC (2018)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED : 17.05.2018

¶3

CORAM

¶4

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE P.RAJAMANICKAM Crl.O.P No.13889 of 2018

¶5

P.Krishnamoorthy .. Petitioner

¶6

¶7

The Inspector of Police, Kallakurichi Police Station Villupuram District .. Respondent

¶8

Prayer: Petition filed Under Section 482 of Cr.P. C to direct the respondent to consider petitioner's representation dated 14.05.2018 and to give police protection and permission to conduct cultural programmes at Arulmigu Sri Devi Muthumariyamman Swami Temple, Perumangalam Village, Villupuram District scheduled to be held on 19.05.2018.

¶9

For Petitioner : Mr.T.Balachandran For Respondent : Mrs.Kritika Kamal.P Government Advocate (Crl.Side) ORDER

¶10

This petition has been filed to direct the respondent police to consider the representation submitted by the petitioner and pass appropriate orders for conducting temple festival and cultural programme.

¶11

2 The learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that even though the petitioner has submitted representation before the respondent well in advance seeking permission and police protection for conducting temple festival and also for conducting cultural programme, so far the respondent police has not passed any order and hence he requests to direct the respondent police to dispose of the representation submitted by the petitioner at an early date.

¶12

3. The learned Government Advocate (Crl.side) has submitted that because of the law and order problem the representation is kept pending.

¶13

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶14

4. Considering the aforesaid submissions, the respondent is directed to consider the petitioner's representation and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law before the date of the programme and intimate the same to the petitioner.

¶15

5. With the above observation and direction, this criminal original petition is disposed of. Sd/Assistant Registrar

¶16

//True Copy//

¶17

Sub Assistant Registrar
cgi/gpa
To
1. The Inspector of Police,
Kallakurichi Police Station
Villupuram District
2. The Public Prosecutor
High Court, Madras.
+1cc to Mr.T.BALACHANDRAN, Advocate, S.R.No. 33877
Crl.O.P No.13889 of 2018
NA(CO)
TR(18/05/2018)

¶18

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

P.Krishnamoorthy, v. the Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

P.Krishnamoorthy, v. the Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Kavitha, F/a 33 Years, Vs the State Rep by Its

V.Venkatesan, Aged 52 Years, Vs the State Rep. by

K.Kittusamy, M/55, Vs the Inspector of Police

L.Kuppusamy, M/a 59 Years, Vs the State Rep by Its

P.Kannan, Aged 55 Years Vs the Inspector of Police

A.Sathish, M/A.48 Vs the State of Tamilnadu