V.Venkatesan, Aged 52 Years, v. the State Rep. by
Case brief
What is this about?
An anticipatory bail petition was dismissed as withdrawn by the petitioner's counsel upon endorsement.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
( Criminal Jurisdiction )
Wednesday, the Sixteenth day of May Two Thousand Eighteen
PRESENT
The Hon`ble Mr Justice P. RAJAMANICKAM
CRIMINAL ORIGINAL PETITION No.13509 of 2018
V.VENKATESAN [ PETITIONER / ACCUSED ]
THE STATE REP. BY, [ RESPONDENT ] THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, TIRUVANNAMALAI TALUK POLICE STATION, TIRUVANNAMALAI DISTRICT. CR.NO.320 OF 2018.
For Petitioner : M/S.S.SHANKAR Advocate
For Respondent : MR.K.PRABAKAR, ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C.
ORDER : The Court Made the following order :-
The learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the petition and he has also made an endorsement to that effect.
This order, on being produced, be punctually observed and carried into execution by all concerned
Sub-Assistant Registrar (Statistics/C.S.) High Court, Madras - 600 104.
TO
1 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, TIRUVANNAMALAI TALUK POLICE STATION, TIRUVANNAMALAI DISTRICT.
2 THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT, MADRAS.
CC to M/S.S.SHANKAR Advocate on payment of necessary charges
CRL OP.13509/2018 Date :16/05/2018 MK:21/05/2018
V. VENKATESAN
THE STATE
P. RAJAMANICKAM
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court