Disposed

K.Kittusamy, M/55, v. the Inspector of Police

Madras HC16 May 2018CRL OP/13522/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Court directed the Respondent Police to consider representations by the Petitioner and another individual regarding police protection and permission to conduct a temple festival and cultural programs on specified dates and pass appropriate orders by the specified deadline.

What did the court decide?

Directed respondent to consider petitioners and another representation and pass appropriate orders by 17.05.2018 at 10 A.M.

K.Kittusamy, M/55, Vs the Inspector of Police — Madras HC (2018) — LawSathi Research

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED: 16.05.2018

¶3

CORAM

¶4

THE HONOURABLE Mr.JUSTICE P. RAJAMANICKAM

¶5

Crl.OP.No.13522 of 2018

¶6

K.Kittusamy .. Petitioner

¶7

¶8

The Inspector of Police, Kangayam Police Station, Tiruppur District. .. Respondent

¶9

Prayer:

¶10

Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 Cr.PC, praying to direct the respondent to consider the petitioner's representation dated 07.05.2018 to provide police protection and permission to conduct village folk dance and other cultural programs to be held on 17.05.2018 and 18.05.2018 at Arulmiku Mandagansa Karuppanasamy Temple, situated at Thalakkarai, Katayure Village, Kangayam Taluk, Tiruppur District.

¶11

For Petitioner : Mr.K.Sudhakar

¶12

For Respondent : Mrs.Kritika Kamal.P Government Advocate (Crl.Side) O R D E R

¶13

This petition has been filed to direct the respondent to grant permission and also police protection for conducting temple festival on 17.05.2018 and 18.05.2018 at Arulmiku Mandagansa Karuppanasamy Temple, situated at Thalakkarai, Katayure Village, Kangayam Taluk, Tiruppur District.

¶14

Heard Mr.K.Sudhakar, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Mrs.Kritika Kamal.P, learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the respondent.

¶15

The learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is the Secretary of the Arulmiku Mandagansa Karuppanasamy Temple, situated at Thalakkarai, Katayure Village, Kangayam Taluk, Tiruppur District. He has further submitted that the village people used to celebrate the aforesaid temple festival every year. Like wise, in this year also they have

¶16

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶17

decided to celebrate the aforesaid temple festival on 17.05.2018 and 18.05.2018.

¶18

He has further submitted that during the aforesaid temple festival, some cultural programs also will be conducted and hence the petitioner has submitted a representation to the respondent police on 07.05.2018, seeking permission and also for police protection, but, so far no order has been passed and hence he requested to direct the respondent to consider the petitioner's representation.

¶19

The learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) on the other hand submitted that one Mr.Ponnusamy also gave a representation mentioning that he is Secretary to the said temple and also seeks permission for celebrating festival on the same day and hence the representations submitted by the petitioner as well as the said Ponnusamy are kept pending.

¶20

Considering the aforesaid submissions, the respondent police is directed to consider the representation submitted by the petitioner dated 07.05.2018 and also the representation submitted by the opposite party, Mr.Ponnusamy and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law on or before 17.05.2018 at 10.A.M and intimate the same to both the parties. With the above directions, the Criminal Original Petition stands disposed of.

¶21

Sd/Assistant Registrar/Vacation Officer(AD I) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar ak To 1. The Inspector of Police, Kangayam Police Station, Tiruppur District

¶22

The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras. +1cc to Mr.K.Sudhakar, Advocate, S.R.No.33691

¶23

Crl.OP.No.135222 of 2018

¶24

CNR(CO) CS/17/05/18

¶25

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

K.Kittusamy, M/55, v. the Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

K.Kittusamy, M/55, v. the Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Muthaiah Vs the Inspector of Police

K.Janaki Ammal Vs Masilamani Reddy(Died)

Manonmani Vs D.Selvaraj

Jeyabal Vs Sathya

S.Sathish Kumar Vs the Inspector of Police

Surender @ Mariya Surendiran Vs State Rep.by