Allowed

R.P.Ramkumar, v. the Inspector of Police

Madras HC15 Mar 2018CRL MP(MD)/1973/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court modified the bail conditions imposed on petitioners accused of crime No. 31/2017. The court altered the existing reporting regimes to require the petitioners to appear before the police once weekly on Mondays until further orders.

What did the court decide?

Bail conditions modified to require petitioners to appear before respondent police once a week on every Monday at 10.30 am until further orders.

R.P.Ramkumar, Vs the Inspector of Police — Bail and Remand | Madras HC (2018)

¶1

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction )

¶2

Thursday, the Fifteenth day of March Two Thousand Eighteen

¶3

PRESENT

¶4

The Hon`ble Mr.Justice R.PONGIAPPAN

¶5

CRL MP(MD) No.1973 of 2018 IN CRL OP(MD) No.15982 of 2017

¶6

1 R.P.RAMKUMAR, 2 DEEPA, ... PETITIONERS/PETITIONERS ACCUSED NOS.1 AND 2

¶7

STATE REP.BY

¶8

THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, ANTI LAND GRABBING WING, DISTRICT CRIME BRANCH, DINDIGUL DISTRICT. (CRIME 31/2017) ... RESPONDENT/RESPONDENT/

¶9

RESPONDENT

¶10

Petition praying that in the circumstances stated therein and in the petition filed therewith the High Court will be pleased to relax the condition imposed on the petitioners in Crl.OP(MD)No. 15982/2017 dated 25.01.2018 on the file of this Honourable Court in connection with crime No. 31/2017 on the file of the respondent

¶11

Order : This petition coming on for orders upon perusing the petition filed in support thereof and upon hearing the arguments of M/S.J.LAWRANCE, Advocate for the petitioner and of MR.K.SUYAMBULINGA BHARATHI, Government Advocate (Crl.Side) for the Respondent the court made the following order:-

¶12

This Petition has been filed to relax the condition imposed in Crl.O.P.(MD) No. 15982 of 2017, dated 25.01.2018.

¶13

2.Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners.

¶14

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 3.The learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the State submitted that the petitioners herein are complying with the

¶15

condition regularly, without any deviation and he further submitted that the charge sheet is not yet filed.

¶16

4.Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and also considering the submission made by the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side), the condition imposed on the petitioners in Crl.O.P.(MD) No. 15982 of 2017, dated 25.01.2018, is modified to the extent that the petitioners shall appear before the respondent Police once in a week i.e on every Monday at 10.30 am until further orders.

¶17

sd/15/03/2018 / TRUE COPY /

¶18

Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

¶19

¶20

1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO.II, DINDIGUL

¶21

2 DO THROUGH THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE DINDIGUL DISTRICT

¶22

3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, ANTI LAND GRABBING WING, DISTRICT CRIME BRANCH, DINDIGUL DISTRICT.

¶23

4 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI. +1. C.C. to M/S.J.LAWRANCE Advocate SR.No.4193

¶24

TRP

¶25

GJM/CM/VR/SAR-2-21.3.18-2P-6C

¶26

ORDER

¶27

IN CRL MP(MD) No.1973 of 2018 IN

¶28

CRL OP(MD) No.15982 of 2017 Date :15/03/2018

¶29

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

R.P.Ramkumar, v. the Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

R.P.Ramkumar, v. the Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Kumar Vs the Inspector of Police

I. Lakshmanan Vs the Inspector of Police

Sridhar Pappy, Vs the Inspector of Police

Biju Vs the Inspector of Police

Ramamoorthypandian Vs the Sub Inspector of Police

Raja @ Rajan Vs the Inspector of Police