Partly allowed

Chinnan, v. the Inspector of Police

Madras HC2 Mar 2018CRL MP(MD)/1558/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Madras High Court, Madurai Bench modified bail conditions imposed previously. Relying on the submission that the petitioner has been complying and investigation is pending, the court ordered the petitioner to appear on every Monday at 10.30 a.m. before the police.

What did the court decide?

Awarded relaxation of bail conditions requiring the petitioner to appear before the respondent police once a week on Mondays at 10.30 a.m.

Chinnan, Vs the Inspector of Police — Bail and Remand | Madras HC (2018)

¶1

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction )

¶3

Friday, the Second day of March Two Thousand Eighteen

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

The Hon`ble Mr.Justice R.PONGIAPPAN

¶6

CRL MP(MD) No.1558 of 2018 IN CRL OP(MD) No.1330 of 2018

¶7

CHINNAN ... PETITIONER/SOLE ACCUSED

¶8

THE STATE REPRESENTED BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, SEDAPATTI POLICE STATION, MADURAI DISTRICT. (CRIME NO.256 OF 2017) ... RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT

¶9

Petition praying that in the circumstances stated therein and in the petition filed therewith the High Court will be pleased to pass an order relax the condition imposed on the petitioner in Crl. OP(MD)No. 1330/2018 dated 29.01.2018 in Crime No. 256/2017 on the file of this Honourable Court

¶10

Order : This petition coming on for orders upon perusing the petition filed in support thereof and upon hearing the arguments of M/S.D.BALAMURUGAPANDI, Advocate for the petitioner and of M/S.K.SUYAMBULINGA BHARATHI, Government Advocate (Crl.Side)on behalf of the Respondents the court made the following order:-

¶11

This petition has been filed to relax the condition imposed in Crl.O.P.(MD)No.1330 of 2018, dated 29.01.2018.

¶12

Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner.

¶13

3.The learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) appearing https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ for the State submitted that the petitioner is abiding the condition from 01.02.2018 without any deviation. Further he added that the

¶14

¶15

investigation is not yet completed.

¶16

4.Considering the submission made by the learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) that the petitioner is abiding the condition without any deviation and the investigation is not yet completed, hence, the earlier condition imposed on the petitioner is modified to the extent that the petitioner shall appear before the respondent police once in a week, i.e., on every Monday, at 10.30 a.m. until further orders.

¶17

Accordingly, this petition is ordered.

¶18

sd/02/03/2018

¶19

/ TRUE COPY /

¶20

Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

¶21

¶22

1 THE DISTRICT MUNSIF CUM JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, PERIYOOR, MADURAI DISTRICT.

¶23

2 DO THROUGH THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, MADURAI DISTRICT.

¶24

3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, SEDAPATTI POLICE STATION, MADURAI DISTRICT.

¶25

4 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, OTTANCHATHIRAM POLICE STATION, DINDIGUL DISTRICT.

¶26

5 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

¶27

PK/CM-VR/SAR-2/27.03.2018 : 2P/6C

¶28

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Chinnan, v. the Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Chinnan, v. the Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

V.Nallaperumal Vs the Sub Inspector of Police

R. Muniyasamy Vs the Inspector of Police

Mariya Vs the Inspector of Police

Venkatesh Vs the Inspector of Police

Vijayalakshmi, Vs the Sub-Inspector of Police

Jayaraman, Vs the Inspector of Police