Allowed

Venkatesh v. the Inspector of Police

Madras HC2 Mar 2018CRL MP(MD)/1514/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Madurai Bench of Madras High Court granted a petition to relax conditions of bail imposed in Crl.OP(MD)No.814 of 2018. The petitioner was ordered to appear once every week at 10:30 a.m. given that investigation was pending and the petitioner was complying with previous directions without deviation.

What did the court decide?

The petitioner shall appear before the Court concerned once in a week on every Monday at 10.30 a.m. until further orders.

Venkatesh Vs the Inspector of Police — Bail and Remand | Madras HC (2018)

¶1

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction )

¶3

Friday, the Second day of March Two Thousand Eighteen

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

The Hon`ble Mr.Justice R.PONGIAPPAN

¶6

CRL MP(MD) No.1514 of 2018 IN CRL OP(MD) No.814 of 2018

¶7

VENKATESH ... PETITIONER/PETITIONER

¶8

¶9

STATE REPRESENTED BY,

¶10

THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, ALL WOMEN POLICE STATION, KOVILPATTI, THOOTHUKUDI DISTRICT.

¶11

IN CRIME NO.7/2017 ... RESPONDENT/RESPONDENT

¶12

Petition praying that in the circumstances stated therein and in the petition filed therewith the High Court will be pleased to relax the condition imposed in Crl.OP(MD)No. 814/2018 dated 22.01.2018

¶13

Order : This petition coming on for orders upon perusing the petition filed in support thereof and upon hearing the arguments of M/S.M.MICHAEL BHARATHI, Advocate for the petitioner and of M/S.K.SUYAMBULINGA BHARATHI, Government Advocate (Crl.Side)on behalf of the Respondents the court made the following order:-

¶14

This petition has been filed to relax the condition imposed in Crl.O.P.(MD)No.814 of 2018, dated 22.01.2018.

¶15

Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner.

¶16

The learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) appearing for the State submitted that the petitioner is abiding the condition from 30.01.2018 without any deviation. Further he added that the investigation is not yet completed.

¶17

Considering the submission made by the learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) that the petitioner is abiding https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ the condition without any deviation and the investigation is not yet completed, the earlier condition imposed on the petitioner is

¶18

¶19

modified to the extent that the petitioner shall appear before the Court concerned, once in a week, i.e., on every Monday, at 10.30 a.m. until further orders.

¶20

Accordingly, this petition is ordered.

¶21

sd/-

¶22

02/03/2018 / TRUE COPY /

¶23

Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.)

¶24

Madurai Bench of Madras High Court,

¶25

Madurai - 625 023.

¶26

¶27

1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO.I, KOVILPATTI.

¶28

2 DO THROUGH THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, THOOTHUKUDI.

¶29

3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, ALL WOMEN POLICE STATION, KOVILPATTI,

¶30

THOOTHUKUDI DISTRICT.

¶31

4 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

¶32

+1. C.C. to M/S.V.SASIKUMAR, Advocate SR.No.3371

¶33

ORDER IN CRL MP(MD) No.1514 of 2018 IN CRL OP(MD) No.814 of 2018 Date :02/03/2018

¶34

PK/CM-VR/SAR-2/07.03.2018 : 2P/6C

¶35

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Venkatesh v. the Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Venkatesh v. the Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

V.Nallaperumal Vs the Sub Inspector of Police

R. Muniyasamy Vs the Inspector of Police

Mariya Vs the Inspector of Police

Vijayalakshmi, Vs the Sub-Inspector of Police

Chinnan, Vs the Inspector of Police

Jayaraman, Vs the Inspector of Police