Dismissed

Hakkim, Aged About 70 Years v. State Represented by

Madras HC20 Nov 2018CRL MP/1901/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In Criminal Miscellaneous Petition No.1901 of 2017, the High Court of Madras considered a petition for suspension of sentence and bail. The Government Advocate highlighted the victim's age (7 years) and the nature of the sexual misbehavior. The court, considering the gravity of the offence, refused the prayer and dismissed the petition.

What did the court decide?

The prayer for suspension of sentence and release on bail was dismissed.

Hakkim, Aged About 70 Years Vs State… — Child Sexual Offences (POCSO) | Madras HC (2018)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

( Criminal Jurisdiction )

¶3

Tuesday, the Twentieth day of November Two Thousand Eighteen

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

The Hon`ble Mr Justice V. PARTHIBAN

¶6

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS PETITION No.1901 of 2017

¶7

in CRL.A.NO.65/2017

¶8

HAKKIM, [ PETITIONER/APPELLANT/ACCUSED]

¶9

¶10

STATE REPRESENTED BY [ RESPONDENT ] INSPECTOR OF POLICE, DEVARSHOLA POLICE STATION, GUDALUR, NILGIRIS.

¶11

Petition praying that in the circumstances stated therein and in the Memorandum of Grounds in Criminal APPEAL No.65 OF 2017 on the file of the High Court, the High Court will be pleased to grant suspension of the sentence passed in Spl.S.C.No.16/2016 dated 23/12/2016 on the file of the learned Sessions Judge, Mahila Court, (Fast Track Court), Udhagamandalam, and release the petitioner on bail.

¶12

Order : This petition coming on for orders upon perusing the petition and the Memorandum of Grounds in Crl.A.No.65 of 2017 on the file of the High Court and upon hearing the arguments of M/S.K.F.MANAVALAN, Advocate for the petitioner and of Mrs.V.SARATHA DEVI, Government Advocate (Crl.Side) on behalf of the Respondent the court made the following order:-

¶13

This miscellaneous petition has been filed to suspend the sentence passed by the learned Sessions Judge, Mahila Court (Fast Track Court), Udhagamandalam, in Spl.S.C.No.16/2016, dated 23.12.2016.

¶14

2. Heard both sides.

¶15

3. The learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) submitted that the victim boy is aged about only 7 years and the petitioner/accused had sexual misbehavior with the victim boy on various occasions. Therefore, she prayed for dismissal of this miscellaneous petition.

¶16

4. Considering the gravity of the offence and the submissions of the Learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side), this Court is not

¶17

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶18

inclined to grant the relief sought for in this miscellaneous petition and the same is dismissed.

¶19

-sd/20/11/2018

¶20

This order, on being produced, be punctually observed and carried into execution by all concerned

¶21

TRUE COPY
Sub-Assistant Registrar (Statistics/C.S.)
High Court, Madras - 600 104.
TO
1 THE SESSIONS JUDGE,
MAHILA COURT (FAST TRACK COURT),
UDHAGAMANDALAM.
2 THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
HIGH COURT, MADRAS.
3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE,
DEVARSHOLA POLICE STATION,
GUDALUR, NILGIRIS.
+1 C.C. to M/S.K.F.MANAVALAN Advocate on payment of necessary
charges-Sr.22225
Order
in
CRL MP.1901/2017
in CRL.A.NO.65/2017
Date :20/11/2018

¶22

From 7.2.2001 the Registry is issuing certified copies of the BAIL/Anti.BAIL Orders in this format ths : 29.11.2018

¶23

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Hakkim, Aged About 70 Years v. State Represented by

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Hakkim, Aged About 70 Years v. State Represented by

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Vijayakumar, Aged 43 Years, Vs State Rep. by

Sailesh, M/a 42 Years, Vs the State Rep by Its

Ramesh Kumar Jain, Aged 55 Vs Mr.Suresh Kumar Goud

T.L.Sundaram Vs Tamilnadu Water Supply and

Sabari @ Sabarinathan Vs the Inspector of Police

M.Loganathan Vs Selvarani