The court considered a petition to condone a 663-day delay in preferring a revision case. Finding the reasons in the affidavit satisfactory and noting the respondent's absence, the court condoned the delay and allowed the petition.
Delay of 663 days is condoned and the petition is allowed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
Crl.M.P.No.15274 of 2018 in Crl.RC.Sr.No.54321 of 2018
V.PARTHIBAN,J.
This is a petition seeking to condone the delay of 663 days in preferring the above revision case.
2.Despite notice having been
served on the respondent and her
name also printed in the cause list,
there is no representation on
behalf of the respondent.
3. Heard the learned counsel
for the petitioner.
4. Being satisfied with the
reasons assigned in the affidavit
filed in support of this petition, the
delay is condoned and this petition
is allowed.
06.12.2018
msk
2
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the delay of 663 days in filing the revision petition can be condoned.
V. Parthiban
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
