Allowed

Palani v. State by

Madras HC5 Dec 2018CRL MP/15851/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Criminal Miscellaneous Petition sought suspension of sentence and bail for the appellants pending disposal of their criminal appeal. The High Court allowed the petition, suspending the sentence subject to the appellants executing a bond with sureties and appearing in court on the first working day of every month.

What did the court decide?

Sentence suspended pending disposal of appeal; bail granted with bond Rs. 10,000 and sureties; appearance required on first working day every month.

Palani Vs State by — Bail and Remand | Madras HC (2018)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

( Criminal Jurisdiction )

¶3

Wednesday, the Fifth day of December Two Thousand Eighteen

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

The Hon`ble Mr Justice V. PARTHIBAN

¶6

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS PETITION No.15851 of 2018

¶7

in CRL.A.No.757 of 2018 1 PALANI [ PETITIONERS ]

¶8

¶9

STATE BY [ RESPONDENT ] INSPECTOR OF POLICE, POLUR POLICE STATION, THIRUVANNAMALAI DISTRICT. CRIME NO.583 OF 2013

¶10

Petition praying that in the circumstances stated therein and in the Memorandum of Grounds in CRL.A.No.757 of 2018 on the file of the High Court, the High Court will be pleased to suspend the sentence imposed on the petitioners/Appellants herein in S.C.No.111 of 2015 by judgment dated 12.11.2018 passed by the Learned Principal District Sessions Judge, Thiruvannamalai, Thiruvannamalai District and enlarge the petitioners on bail pending disposal of the above CRL.A.No.757 of 2018 [CRL.M.P.No.15851 of 2018]

¶11

Order : This petition coming on for orders upon perusing the petition and the Memorandum of Grounds in Crl.A.No.757 of 2018 on the file of the High Court and upon hearing the arguments of M/S.K.BALU, Advocate for the petitioners, and of Mrs.V.SARATHADEVI Government Advocate on behalf of the Respondent the court made the following order:-

¶12

This miscellaneous petition has been filed seeking to suspend the sentence imposed on the petitioners by the learned Principal District Sessions Judge, Thiruvannamalai, Thiruvannamalai District, dated 12.11.2018 in S.C.No.111 of 2015 and enlarge the petitioners on bail till the disposal of criminal appeal, the petitioners are before this Court with this petition.

¶13

Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned Government Advocate (crl.side) appearing for the respondent.

¶14

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶15

Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, this miscellaneous petition is allowed and the sentence passed by the learned Principal District Sessions Judge, Thiruvannamalai, Thiruvannamalai District, dated 12.11.2018 in S.C.No.111 of 2015, is suspended on condition that the petitioners shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Principal District Sessions Judge, Thiruvannamalai, Thiruvannamalai District. Further, the petitioners shall appear before the trial Court on every first working day of every month at 10.30 a.m until further orders.

¶16

-sd/-
05/12/2018
This order, on being produced, be punctually observed and carried
into execution by all concerned
TRUE COPY
Sub-Assistant Registrar (Statistics/C.S.)
High Court, Madras - 600 104.
TO
1 THE PRINCIPAL DISTRICT SESSIONS JUDGE,
THIRUVANNAMALAI,
THIRUVANNAMALAI DISTRICT
2 THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
HIGH COURT, MADRAS.
3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE,
POLUR POLICE STATION,
THIRUVANNAMALAI DISTRICT
+1C.C. to M/S.K.BALU Advocate on payment of necessary charges
SR.NO.23229
Order
in
CRL M.P.15851 of 2018
in
CRL.A.No.757 of 2018
Date :05/12/2018

¶17

From 7.2.2001 the Registry is issuing certified copies of the BAIL/Anti.BAIL Orders in this format

¶18

cm 05/12/2018

¶19

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Palani v. State by

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Palani v. State by

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Jayalakshmi, Age 60 Yrs Vs the Sub-Divisional Magistrate/

Kumar @ Uthirakumar, Vs State Rep by

T.K.Deepak, Aged 32 Yrs, Vs D.Mohana Sundaram

N. Ramesh, Vs Smt. Sonal.B. Mishra I.P.S

Chintadripet Koovam Vs Ms.Mala

Mr.R.Rajakumar, M/A-48 Years Vs Mr.Mahaboob Jan