J.Venugopal, Superintending v. Dr.D.Karthikeyan, I.A.S.
Case brief
What is this about?
A contempt petition under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 was closed at the hearing upon the representation that the order in W.P.No.26710 of 2014 had been complied with.
What the court decided
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 06.12.2018
CORAM
THE HON'BLE Mr. JUSTICE V.PARTHIBAN
Cont.P.No.120 of 2018 J.Venugopal ... Petitioner Vs. Dr.D.Karthikeyan I.A.S., Commissioner, Chennai City Municipal Corporation, Ripon Buildings, Chennai – 600 003. ... Respondent Prayer : Petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act 1971, to punish the respondent for disobeying the orders of this Court in W.P.No.26710 of 2014 dated 08.09.2017.
For Petitioner : Mr.T.Ranganathan For Respondent : Mrs.Karthika Ashok
O R D E R
The petitioner has filed this contempt petition to punish the respondent for disobeying the orders of this Court in W.P.No.26710 of 2014 dated 08.09.2017.
- When the matter is taken up for hearing, it is
represented by the learned counsel appearing for the https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ petitioner as well as the learned counsel appearing for the
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
J. Venugopal
- respondent
Dr. D. Karthikeyan I.A.S., Commissioner, Chennai City Municipal Corporation
Coram
V. Parthiban
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court