Santhanaraj v. Palanisamy
Case brief
What is this about?
This contempt petition was dismissed because the respondents submitted evidence proving compliance with the impugned order via a court process recording as of 22.02.2016.
What did the court decide?
The contempt petition was closed due to established compliance with the impugned order.
What the court decided
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 08.06.2018
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.SATHYANARAYANAN AND THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE N.SESHASAYEE
Cont.P.No.3001 of 2014
Santhanaraj .. Petitioner
Vs.
1.Palanisamy, Managing Director, Tamil Nadu Housing Board,
Nandanam, Madras-600 035.
2.Ganesan, Secretary and Personnel Officer, Tamil Nadu Housing Board, Nandanam, Madras-600 035.
.. Respondents
Prayer : Contempt Petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Court Act, praying to punish the respondents for wilful disobedience of the order dated 24.06.2014 made in W.A.No.500 of 2012.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether there was wilful disobedience of the order dated 24.06.2014 warranting punishment for contempt.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Santhanaraj
- respondent
Palanisamy
- respondent
Ganesan
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court