Vs
Case brief
What is this about?
In this contempt petition, the Court examined whether the respondents complied with an earlier order regarding the accommodation of the petitioner as a Helper. The Court ruled that the order was complied with in a manner beneficial to the petitioner and dismissed the claim for recovery of benefits.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 02.07.2018
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.SATHYANARAYANAN AND
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.SESHASAYEE
Contempt Petition No.3094 of 2014
A.Subramani
S/o.Arunachalam Goundar .. Petitioner
Vs
1.Krishnamoorthy
Chief Engineer (Personnel)
800, Anna Salai,
TNEB, Chennai.
2.M.Noor Mohamed
Superintending Engineer,
Tiruvannamalai Electricity Distribution Circle,
TNEB, Tiruvannamalai. .. Respondents
Contempt Petition filed u/s.11 of the Contempt of
Courts Act, 1971, praying to punish the respondents for
willful disobedience in violating the order passed in
W.A.No.1916 of 2013 dated 19.03.2014.
For Petitioner : Mr.S.N.Ravichandran
For Respondents : Mr.Anand Gopalan
******
2
O R D E R
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the High Court order dated 19.03.2014 in W.A.No.1916 of 2013 has been complied with by the respondents.
Whether salary or benefits paid to the petitioner due to delay in accommodation can be recovered.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
A.Subramani
- respondent
Krishnamoorthy
- respondent
M.Noor Mohamed
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court