M.Sivan Vs Thiru. Hans Raj Verma, IAS

¶1

1

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED:26.11.2018

¶4

Coram

¶5

The Hon'ble Mr. Justice V.PARTHIBAN

¶6

Cont.P.No.1682 of 2018

¶7

M.Sivan ... Petitioner
vs.
1.Hans Raj Verma,I.A.S.,
Principal Secretary,
Government of Tamil Nadu,
Rural Development & Panchayat Raj Department,
Fort St.George,
Chennai-600 009
2.K.Balakaran,I.A.S.,
The Director/Commissioner,
Rural Develoment and Panchayat Raj Department,
having office at Panagal Maaligai,
Saidapet, Chennai-600 015 ... Respondents
Petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of
Courts Act to punish the respondents for the wilful
disobedience of the order passed by this Court in
W.P.No.8449 of 2015, dated 09.04.2018.
For Petitioner .. Mr.P.Ganesan
For Respondents .. Mr.K.Bhuvaneswari,A.G.P.

¶8

ORDER

¶9

Alleging that the order of this Court, dated 09.04.2018, made in W.P.No.8449 of 2015, has not been https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ complied with by the respondents, the petitioner has come

¶10

2

¶11

up with the contempt petition.

¶12

represented by the learned Additional Government Pleader that the direction issued by this Court, vide its order

¶13

dated 09.04.2018 has been complied with by the first respondent, by passing proceedings, dated 30.07.2018,

¶14

rejecting the claim of the petitioner.

¶15

petition is closed. If the petitioner is aggrieved by the rejection order passed by the first respondent, it is always open to him to challenge the said order in an

¶16

appropriate proceedings, in the manner known to law and it is not open to him to sustain the present contempt

¶17

petition, in view the compliance reported by the first respondent.

¶18

SD/ASSISTANT REGISTRAR(COMM.CASES)

¶19

msk

¶20

Dated at Madras this the day of 2019.

¶21

COURT OFFICER(O.S.)

¶22

from 25^th day of September 2008 the Registry is issuing Certified copies of the Orders/Judgments/Decrees in this format. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶23

PS/12/12/2018

M.Sivan v. Thiru. Hans Raj Verma, IAS

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

M.Sivan v. Thiru. Hans Raj Verma, IAS

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

L.Vishwanathan, Aged 43 Years Vs P.Kanchana, Aged 38 Years

G.Krishnan, Vs E.Sathish Kumar

Cholamandalam Invesment and Vs the Inspector

M.Shanmugam Vs Thiru. Hans Raj Verma, IAS

G.Madhaiyan Vs Thiru. Hans Raj Verma, IAS

L.Mahendran Vs Thiru. Hans Raj Verma, IAS