Petitioner applied to withdraw Criminal Revision Petitions seeking quashing of certain orders. Court granted permission and dismissed the petitions as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 23.11.2018
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.PARTHIBAN Crl.R.C.Nos.928 & 929 of 2017
Cholamandalam Investment
and Finance Company Ltd.,
Rep.by its Authorised Signatory
Mr.S.Sivasubramanian ... Petitioner in
both the Crl.R.Cs.
Vs.
1.The Inspector,
Kayarlabath Police Station,
Ariyalur District
2.Mr.Armugham ... Respondents
1 and 2 in Crl.R.C.No.928 of
2017 Respondents 1 and 3 in
Crl.R.C.No.929 of 2017
3.Mrs.Akila
... 2 nd Respondent
in Crl.R.C.No.929 of 2017
Criminal Revision Petitions filed against the order
dated 02.05.2017, made in Crl.M.P.Nos.2248 of 2016 and 2069
of 2016, in Crime No.53 of 2016, on the file of the
Judicial Magistrate No.1, Ariyalur.
For Petitioner : Mr.T.Dhanyakumar
For Respondents : Mr.G.Harihara Arun Somasankar
Government Advocate
COMMON ORDER
Today, when the Criminal Revision Petitions are taken up for hearing, the learned counsel for the petitioner has sought permission of this Court to withdraw the Criminal Revision Petitions. He has also made an endorsement to that effect.
Sd/-
Assistant Registrar(CS II)
//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
msk
To
1.The Judicial Magistrate No.1, Ariyalur.
2.The Inspector,
Kayarlabath Police Station,
Ariyalur District.
3.The Public Prosecutor,
High Court, Madras.
+1cc to Mr.T.Dhanyakumar , Advocate SR.No. 80138
Crl.R.C.Nos.928 & 929 of 2017
ASK(26/11/2018)
Cholamandalam Investment and Finance Company Ltd.
The Inspector, Kayarlabath Police Station, Ariyalur District
Mr. Armugham
Mrs. Akila
V. Parthiban
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
