Petitioner filed a contempt petition alleging non-compliance of an order in W.P.No.8447 of 2015. The court closed the petition upon representation that the order was complied with via proceedings dated 30.07.2018 rejecting the petitioner's claim.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED:26.11.2018
Coram
The Hon'ble Mr. Justice V.PARTHIBAN
Cont.P.No.1680 of 2018
G.Madhaiyan ... Petitioner
vs.
1.Hans Raj Verma,I.A.S.,
Principal Secretary,
Government of Tamil Nadu,
Rural Development & Panchayat Raj Department,
Fort St.George,
Chennai-600 009
2.K.Balakaran,I.A.S.,
The Director/Commissioner,
Rural Develoment and Panchayat Raj Department,
having office at Panagal Maaligai,
Saidapet, Chennai-600 015 ... Respondents
Petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of
Courts Act to punish the respondents for the wilful
disobedience of the order passed by this Court in
W.P.No.8447 of 2015, dated 09.04.2018.
For Petitioner .. Mr.P.Ganesan
For Respondents .. Mr.K.Bhuvaneswari,A.G.P.
ORDER
Alleging that the order of this Court, dated 09.04.2018, made in W.P.No.8447 of 2015, has not been
complied with by the respondents, the petitioner has come
2
up with the contempt petition.
2.When the matter is taken up for hearing, it is represented by the learned Additional Government Pleader that the direction issued by this Court, vide its order dated 09.04.2018 has been complied with by the first
respondent, by passing proceedings, dated 30.07.2018, rejecting the claim of the petitioner.
3.Recording the said submission, this contempt petition is closed. If the petitioner is aggrieved by the rejection order passed by the first respondent, it is always open to him to challenge the said order in an appropriate proceedings, in the manner known to law and it is not open to him to sustain the present contempt petition, in view the compliance reported by the first respondent.
SD/ASSISTANT REGISTRAR(COMM.CASES) msk
//Certified to be true copy//
Dated at Madras this the day of 2019.
COURT OFFICER(O.S.)
from 25th day of September 2008 the Registry is issuing Certified copies of the Orders/Judgments/Decrees in this format.
PS/12/12/2018
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the contempt petition can be sustained given that the direction of the court dated 09.04.2018 has been complied with by the Respondent.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
G.Madhaiyan
Hans Raj Verma I.A.S.
K.Balakaran I.A.S.
V.PARTHIBAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
