Dismissed

P.Ramalingam v. Mr.Krishna Moorthy

Madras HC24 Aug 2018CONT P/1618/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Contempt petition filed for non-filing of final report by an Inspector of Police. The respondent filed a compliance report with an unconditional apology. The court closed the petition, advised the respondent against future non-compliance, and noted the matter is dealt with.

What did the court decide?

Contempt petition closed without punishment; respondent directed not to repeat non-compliance.

P.Ramalingam Vs Mr.Krishna Moorthy — Labour and Industrial Disputes | Madras HC (2018)

¶1

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED : 24.08.2018

¶4

CORAM :

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE T.S.SIVAGNANAM

¶6

Cont.P.No.1618 of 2018
P.Ramalingam .. Petitioner
Vs.
M.Krishnamoorthy
Inspector of Police,
District Crime Branch,
Anti-land Grabbing Cell,
Villupuram,
Villupuram District. .. Respondent
* *
Prayer : Contempt Petition filed under Section 11 of the
Contempt of Court Act, 1971, to punish the respondent
herein for his wilful and deliberate intention, not to obey
the order dated 15.12.2014 passed by this Court in
Cont.P.No.3099 of 2014.
* *

¶7

Prayer : Contempt Petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Court Act, 1971, to punish the respondent herein for his wilful and deliberate intention, not to obey the order dated 15.12.2014 passed by this Court in Cont.P.No.3099 of 2014.

¶8

For Petitioner : Mr.N.Elumalai For Respondent : Mr.J.Purushothaman, Government Advocate (Crl. Side) O R D E R

¶9

The compliance report has been filed by the Inspector of Police, District Crime Branch, Villupuram, tendering unconditional apology for the belated compliance in not filing the final report on or before 30.01.2015.

¶10

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶11

¶12

The report states that the final report has been filed and the concerned Court has taken it on file in C.C.No.103 of 2018.

¶13

The Inspector of Police, District Crime Branch, Villupuram is advised not to repeat such non-compliance of Court orders in future and if it comes to the notice of the Court, it will be dealt with severely. 4. With the above observations, this contempt petition is closed. SD/ASSISTANT REGISTRAR(COMM.CASES) GG //Certified to be true copy// Dated at Madras this the day of 2018. COURT OFFICER(O.S.)

¶14

from 25^th day of September 2008 the Registry is issuing Certified copies of the Orders/Judgments/Decrees in this format.

¶15

PS/11/10/2018

¶16

¶17

The Inspector of Police, District Crime Branch, Anti-land Grabbing Cell, Villupuram, Villupuram District.

¶18

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶19

One cc to Govt Pleader, Sr.No.12244

P.Ramalingam v. Mr.Krishna Moorthy

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

P.Ramalingam v. Mr.Krishna Moorthy

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

V.Mohan Govindadas,Director Vs The Assistant Commissioner

Tvl. Sri Amman Timber Depot, Vs The Commercial Tax Officer

M/s.Bagavathy Traders Vs The commercial Tax officer

T.M. Subramaniam Vs Henry (Died)

P.R. Srinivasan, Vs Koperumdevi

Mrs.Loganayaki, Vs The State of Tamil Nadu