P.R. Srinivasan, v. Koperumdevi
Case brief
What is this about?
This court closed a contempt petition for wilful disobedience because the petitioner had complied with the earlier writ order regarding the Tamil Nadu State Pension Policy, as directed by the respondent Tahsildar.
What did the court decide?
Contempt petition closed as the impugned order had been complied with. Liberty to challenge granted.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 24.08.2018
CORAM :
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE T.S.SIVAGNANAM
Cont.P.No.1603 of 2018 P.R.Srinivasan .. Petitioner Vs. M.Koperundevi, The Tahsildar, Dharmapuri District-636 809. .. Respondent * * * Prayer : Contempt Petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, to punish the respondent for having committed contempt of Court for wilful disobedience of the order of this Court made in W.P.No.32431 of 2016 dated 16.09.2016. * * *
For Petitioner : Mr.M.Naraayanaswamy For Respondent : Mr.K.Rajendra Prasad, Additional Government Pleader * * * O R D E R
The direction issued in this writ petition has been complied with and an order has been passed. Hence, this contempt petition is closed.
2
- Liberty is granted to the petitioner to challenge
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
P.R.Srinivasan
- respondent
M.Koperundevi
Coram
T.S.Sivagnanam
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court