Disposed

V.Mohan Govindadas,Director v. The Assistant Commissioner

Madras HC3 Aug 2018WP/20078/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

High Court directed the Assistant Commissioner to lift the attachment of the petitioner's property after considering a representation and certificate of settled tax arrears under the Samadhan Scheme, subject to a personal hearing.

What did the court decide?

Direction to first respondent to consider petitioner's representation, hold a personal hearing, and lift attachment within two weeks if no other arrears remain.

V.Mohan Govindadas,Director Vs The Assistant Commissioner — Landlord and Tenant | Madras HC (2018)

¶1

In the High Court of Judicature at Madras

¶2

Dated : 03.8.2018

¶3

Coram :

¶4

The Honourable Mr.Justice T.S.SIVAGNANAM

¶5

Writ Petition No.20078 of 2018

¶6

V.Mohan Govindadas, Director, Tvl.Hosur Automotives (P) Ltd. ...Petitioner

¶7

¶8

1.The Assistant Commissioner (CT), Krishnagiri Assessment Circle, Krishnagiri.

¶9

2.The Sub-Registrar, Registrar Office, Krishnagiri. ...Respondents

¶10

PETITION under Article 226 of The Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the first respondent to arrange to send an order of lifting of attachment of property to the second respondent as requested vide representation dated 27.6.2018.

¶11

For Petitioner : Mr.R.Senniappan For Respondents: Mr.M.Hariharan, AGP ORDER

¶12

Mr.M.Hariharan, learned Additional Government Pleader accepts notice for the respondents. Heard both. By consent, the writ petition itself is taken up for final disposal.

¶13

The petitioner seeks a direction to the first respondent to issue appropriate orders to the second respondent lifting the attachment effected on the petitioner's property by considering his representation dated 27.6.2018.

¶14

The petitioner made a representation to the first respondent to lift the attachment, as the entire arrears of sales tax under the provisions of the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act, 1959 for the assessment year 1995-96 have been settled based on the Samadhan Scheme under the Tamil Nadu Government Sales Tax (Settlement of Arrears) Act, 2011 and a certificate of

¶15

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶16

settlement of arrears dated 16.3.2012 has been issued by the Joint Commissioner (CT), Salem Division, Salem.

¶17

The petitioner has stated that the said representation dated 27.6.2018 was refused to be received by the first respondent. Therefore, he met the Joint Commissioner, Salem Division and submitted the representation, which was acknowledged by the office of the Joint Commissioner on 28.6.2018. It is not clear as to why the attachment should still continue when the entire arrears of tax have already been settled in terms of the Tamil Nadu Government Sales Tax (Settlement of Arrears) Act, 2011 and a certificate of settlement of arrears has already been issued. If there are any other dues, then the first respondent should have put the petitioner on notice and separate proceedings should have been initiated. Therefore, the first respondent has to definitely consider the petitioner's representation.

¶18

In the result, the writ petition is disposed of by directing the first respondent to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 27.6.2018, take note of the certificate of settlement of arrears dated 16.3.2012, afford an opportunity of personal hearing and if there are no other arrears payable under the provisions of the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act, 1959, the attachment of the petitioner's personal property shall be lifted within a period of two weeks therefrom. No costs.

¶19

Sd/Assistant Registrar(CS-VII) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar

¶20

¶21

1.The Assistant Commissioner (CT), Krishnagiri Assessment Circle, Krishnagiri.

¶22

2.The Sub-Registrar, Registrar Office, Krishnagiri.

¶23

1 cc to Mr. R. Senniappan, Advocate Sr.53559

¶24

- 1 cc to Mr.Special Government Pleader Sr.53644

¶25

WP.No.20078 of 2018

¶26

SPD(CO) EU(28/08/2018 )

¶27

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

V.Mohan Govindadas,Director v. The Assistant Commissioner

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

V.Mohan Govindadas,Director v. The Assistant Commissioner

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Park Dugar Township Vs Income Tax Officer

M/s.Bhaggyam Construction, Vs The Assistant Commissioner(St)

Park Dugar Township Vs Income Tax Officer

Tvl. Sri Amman Timber Depot, Vs The Commercial Tax Officer

M/s.Bagavathy Traders Vs The commercial Tax officer

Tvl. Vinayaga Traders, Vs The Deputy Commerical Tax