Allowed

Raja Holdings (Firm) v. N.Navaneethakrishnan

Madras HC30 Aug 2018CMP(MD)/4604/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Madurai Bench of Madras High Court heard an appeal concerning the condonation of delay in payment of deficit court fees. The court condoned the 149-day delay subject to depositing a sum with the Mediation Centre and furnishing full papers.

What did the court decide?

Delay of 149 days in paying deficit court fees is condoned subject to payment of Rs. 1,000 to the Mediation Centre and furnishing of papers.

Raja Holdings (Firm) Vs N.Navaneethakrishnan — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Madras HC (2018)

¶1

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Civil Appellate Jurisdiction )

¶2

Thursday, the Thirtieth day of August Two Thousand Eighteen

¶3

PRESENT

¶4

The Honble Mr.Justice T.RAJA and The Honble Mr.Justice KRISHNAN RAMASAMY

¶5

CMP(MD) No.4604 of 2018 IN AS(MD) No.SR52810 of 2017

¶6

RAJA HOLDINGS (FIRM) REP BY ITS MANAGING PARTNER, R.V.SUBRAMANIAM,

¶7

69, TOWN HIGH SCHOOL ROAD, KUMBAKONAM. ... PETITIONER / APPELLANT

¶8

¶9

1 N.NAVANEETHAKRISHNAN

¶10

2 N.KANTHIMATHI

¶11

3 S.RAJINIKANTH

¶12

4 N.MEENAKSHI ... RESPONDENTS / RESPONDENTS

¶13

Petition praying that in the circumstances stated therein and in the affidavit filed therewith the High Court will be pleased to condone the delay of 149 days is filing the deficit court fees in the above First Appeal and pass such further or other orders as this Honourable Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case and thus render justice.

¶14

PRAYER IN AS(MD)No.SR52810 OF 2017:-

¶15

Petition praying that in the circumstances stated therein and in the affidavit filed therewith the High Court will be pleased to set aside the judgment and final decree dated 23.12.2016 in O.S.No.51 of 2013 on the file of the Principal District Judge, Thanjavur in so far as it is against the Appellants and grant the decree as prayed for in favour of the Appellants against the Defendants 3 and 4 as well and pass such further or other orders as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case and thus render justice.

¶16

ORDER : This petition coming on for orders upon perusing the petition and the affidavit filed in support thereof and upon hearing the arguments of Mr.C.MAHADEVAN for M/S.AL.GANTHIMATHI, Advocate for the petitioner and of Mr.M.R.S.PRABHU for Mr.V.K.VIJAYARAGHAVAN for https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ R1 and R2, and Mr.S.BALARAMAN Advocate for R3 and R4,the court made the following order:-

¶17

[Order of the Court was made by T.RAJA,J. ]

¶18

This Civil Miscellaneous Petition is filed seeking to condone the delay of 149 days in paying the deficit Court fees in A.S.(MD) SR.No.52810 of 2017.

¶19

2. Heard both sides.

¶20

Being satisfied with the reasons stated in the affidavit filed in support of this petition, the delay of 149 days in paying the deficit Court fees in A.S.(MD)No.SR 52810 of 2017 is condoned, however, subject to the condition that the petitioner pays a sum of Rs.1,000/- (Rupees one thousand only) to the Mediation and Conciliation Centre attached to this Bench, within one week from today.

¶21

Meanwhile, the learned Counsel for the petitioner is directed to furnish full set of papers to the respective learned Counsel for the respondents.

¶22

sd/-

¶23

30/08/2018

¶24

Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.)

¶25

Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

¶26

¶27

THE PRINCIPAL DISTRICT JUDGE,THANJAVUR.

¶28

COPY TO:THE CO-ORDINATOR, THE MEDIATION AND CONCILIATION CENTRE, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT,MADURAI.

¶29

ORDER

¶30

CMP(MD) No.4604 of 2018

¶31

AS(MD) No.SR52810 of 2017

¶32

Date :30/08/2018

¶33

MV:JC:SAR2:05/09/18/2P/3C

¶34

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Raja Holdings (Firm) v. N.Navaneethakrishnan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Raja Holdings (Firm) v. N.Navaneethakrishnan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

N.T.Bharath Vs the District Collectior

M.Sabeena Begum Vs the District Collector

M.P.Muruganantham, Vs the Registrar General

Dharmalingam, Vs the Executive Officer

Sekar, Vs the District Collector

M.Chandramohan, Vs the Election Commissioner