M.Bhoopathy Vs the Superintending Engineer

in the above appeal, on condition that the 1^st respondent herein/appellant has to deposit 50% of the entire compensation amount along with statutory interest and as per the order passed by this Court, the 1^st respondent herein/appellant has deposited 50% of the entire compensation amount along with statutory interest, ie., a sum of Rs.7,03,664/- before the IV Additional District Court, Ponneri to the credit of LAOP NO. 2314 of 1998 and the present CMP has been

¶11

filed seeking permission to withdraw the said amount.

¶12

The 1^st respondent herein/appellant has no objection in

¶13

permitting the petitioner to withdraw the said amount.

¶14

http://www.judis.nic.in

¶15

2

¶16

N. KIRUBAKARAN,J.

¶17

AND

¶18

ABDUL QUDDHOSE,J.

¶19

nv

¶20

Hence, the petitioner is permitted to withdraw the sum of Rs.7,03,664/- lying to the credit of LAOP No. 2314 of 1998 on the file of IV Additional District Court, Ponneri, within a period of two weeks from the date

¶21

of receipt of a copy of this order and the C.M.P. is ordered accordingly.

¶22

(N.K.K.J.) (A.Q.J.)
nv 16.11.2018
3/4
C.M.P. No. 19748 of 2018
in
A.S. No. 63 of 2018

¶23

http://www.judis.nic.in

M.Bhoopathy v. the Superintending Engineer

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

M.Bhoopathy v. the Superintending Engineer

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Chinnaraj Vs M.P. Murugesan

S.Palani Vs K.Senthamarai Kannan(Deceased)

N.R. Srinivasan Vs M/S. Sagar Investments

Mubeen Vs the State of Tamilnadu Rep.by

Ekambaram Vs the Superintending Engineer

Rangnatha Reddy (Died) Vs the Superintending Engineer