Dismissed

S.Palani v. K.Senthamarai Kannan(Deceased)

Madras HC14 Nov 2018OSA/93/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Court disposed of two original side appeals regarding partition suits. A prior order based on a compromise memo, requiring the appellant to pay a sum of Rs. 1.45 crore, was withdrawn. Subsequently, the appeals were dismissed for default as the appellant failed to comply with the compromise terms.

What did the court decide?

Dismissal of appeals O.S.A.Nos.93 and 94 of 2017 with direction set aside.

S.Palani Vs K.Senthamarai Kannan(Deceased) — Partition | Madras HC (2018)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED : 07.06.2019

¶3

CORAM :

¶4

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.KIRUBAKARAN and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE

¶5

O.S.A.No.93 and 94 of 2017 and C.M.P.No.6567 of 2017

¶6

O.S.A.No.93 of 2017

¶7

S.Palani ..Appellant .Vs.

¶8

1.K.Senthamarai Kannan (deceased)

¶9

R2 to R5 recorded as LRs of the deceased R1 vide order of Court dated 08.01.2018 made in CMP.No.22106 of 2017 in OSA.No.93 of 2017

¶10

2.Kannagi 3.Saroja

¶11

4.Rekha

¶12

5.Minor.Vijai Lokesh Rep. by his next friend, natural guardian mother Rekha

¶13

..Respondents

¶14

PRAYER:- Appeal filed under clause 15 of Letter patent r/w section 36 Rule 1 of O.S.rules against the Judgment and Decree dated 12.01.2016 made in T.O.S.No.22 of 2007.

¶15

For Appellant : Mr.G.Jermiah

¶16

For Respondents: Mr.V.Manohar (for R4 & R5)

¶17

O.S.A.No.94 of 2017

¶18

S.Palani ..Appellant .Vs. 1.Rekha

¶19

2.Minor.Vijai Lokesh Rep. by his next friend, natural guardian mother Rekha ..Respondents

¶20

PRAYER: Appeal under clause 15 of Letter patent r/w section 36 Rule 1 of O.S.rules against the Judgment and Decree dated 12.01.2016 made in Tr.C.S.No.449 of 2008.

¶21

For Appellant : Mr.G.Jermiah

¶22

For Respondents: Mr.V.Manohar

¶23

COMMON JUDGMENT

¶24

(Judgment of the Court was delivered by N.KIRUBAKARAN, J.)

¶25

O.S.A.93 of 2017 has been filed against the Judgment and Decree dated 12.01.2016 made in T.O.S.No.22 of 2007 passed by the learned single Judge.

¶26

2.O.S.A.94 of 2017 has been filed against the Judgment and Decree dated 12.01.2016 made in Tr.C.S.No.449 of 2008 passed by the learned single Judge.

¶27

On 14.11.2018, this Court passed the following order: “5.When the matters are taken up for hearing, Mr.V.Manohar, learned counsel appearing for the respondents and Mr.G.Jermiah, learned counsel appearing for the appellant would jointly state that the matter has been settled and a compromise memo dated 13.11.2018 duly signed by both the parties and counter signed by their respective counsel has been filed before this Court. Both the appellant and the 1^st respondent are present before this Court and they would reiterate that the matter has been settled as per the terms of the memo of compromise.

¶28

¶29

As per the memo of compromise, the appellant has to pay a sum of Rs.1,45,00,000/- on or before 31.03.2019 in three installments. On such payment, the appellant would get the entire property as he paid a sum of Rs.1,45,00,000/-, in lieu of the share of the respondents. These appeals are disposed of in the terms of the compromise memo. The compromise memo shall form part of the decree. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. No costs.”

¶30

4.Since the appellant has not complied with the order passed by this Court on 14.11.2018, the earlier order passed by this

¶31

Court on 14.11.2018 is withdrawn and the present Appeal is dismissed. No costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is also closed.

¶32

sai

¶33

Sd/-

¶34

Assistant Registrar(CS-VI)

¶35

//True Copy//

¶36

Sub Assistant Registrar

¶37

+2CCs to Mr.V.Manohar, Advocate, SR.No.45952 &45953

¶38

O.S.A.Nos.93 and 94 of 2017

¶39

Kak(14/09/2019)

S.Palani v. K.Senthamarai Kannan(Deceased)

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

S.Palani v. K.Senthamarai Kannan(Deceased)

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

N.R. Srinivasan Vs M/S. Sagar Investments

S.M.Mariyam Aysha Umma Vs R.Rohini Mala

Rajathi Vs Raju Padayachi (Died)

Chinnaraj Vs M.P. Murugesan

Mubeen Vs the State of Tamilnadu Rep.by

Ekambaram Vs the Superintending Engineer