Kamalam v. Minor Biruntha
Case brief
What is this about?
Civil Miscellaneous Appeal filed against a dismissed order was dismissed as withdrawn by the High Court of Madras upon counsel's submission and endorsement.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 26.02.2018
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.GOVINDARAJ
C.M.A.No.359 of 2011 and M.P.No.1 of 2011
- Kamalam 2. Kandasubramaniam 3. Susila ... Appellants/Defendants 2,3&7 Vs. 1. Minor. Biruntha, D/o. Ravi 2. Minor. Navitha, D/o. Ravi (Minors rep. by next friend mother Parameshwari) ...Respondents 1& 2/Plaintiffs 3. Natesan 4. Ravi 5. Jayalakshmi 6. Guhan 7. T.R.Rangaraja
(No relief sought against respondents 3 to 7 in the above C.M.A. and they are given up. Hence no batta paid for respondents 3 to 7)
... Respondents 3 to 7/ Defendants 1,4,5,6 & 8
PRAYER: Civil Miscellaneous Appeal filed under Section 43, Rule 1(r) read with Section 104(1) of the Civil Procedure Code, against order and decree dated 16.12.2010 made in I.A.No.195 of 2010 in O.S.No.83 of 2010 on the file of the Principal District Judge, Namakkal.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Kamalam et al.
- respondent
Minor. Biruntha and Minor. Navitha
Coram
M. Govindaraj
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court