The High Court of Judicature at Madras dismissed a Civil Miscellaneous Appeal as infructuous since the learned counsel for the appellant submitted that the matter had been settled out of court, leaving nothing at stake.
The Civil Miscellaneous Appeal was dismissed as infructuous; no costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 26.02.2018
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.GOVINDARAJ
C.M.A.No.2867 of 2014
and M.P.1 of 2014
K.Sathyamoorthy ... Appellant
Vs.
Sundari ... Respondent
PRAYER :
Civil Miscellaneous Appeal filed under Section 47 of the
Guardian and Wards Act, to set aside the decreetal order and
order in Principal District Judge, Villupuram dated 18.04.2013
on the file of Principal District Judge, Villupuram and there by
allow this appeal.
For Appellant : M/s.L.Prabahar
J U D G M E N T
The learned counsel appearing for the appellant submitted
that the matter has been settled out of Court and nothing
survives in this appeal and also made an endorsement to that
effect.
Sd/Assistant Registrar(CS VIII) //True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
dpq
To
C.M.A.No.2867 of 2014
and M.P.1 of 2014
SR(CO)
CS/10/04/18
K. Sathyamoorthy
Sundari
M. Govindaraj
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
